SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CERC) 423

CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Petition under section 79 (1) (a) read with section 62 and 64 of the Electricity Act 2003 and Regulations 36 (a) and 54 of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) Regulations 2014 and Regulation 111 of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulations 1999 for relaxation of the Normative Annual Plant Availability Factor (NAPAF) for specific NTPC thermal generating stations on account of non-availability of coalNTPC
46/MP/2018 on remand



##PAGE1##

CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION NEW DELHI Petition No.46/MP/2018

(on remand)

Coram:

Shri Jishnu Barua, Chairperson Shri Ramesh Babu V, Member

Shri Harish Dudani, Member Shri Ravinder Singh Dhillon, Member

Date of Order: 25th August, 2026

In the matter of:

Petition under section 79 (1) (a) read with section 62 and 64 of the Electricity Act, 2003 and Regulations 36 (a) and 54 of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) Regulations, 2014 and Regulation 111 of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 1999 for relaxation of the Normative Annual Plant Availability Factor (NAPAF) for specific NTPC thermal generating

stations on account of non-availability of coal.

And In the matter of:

Implementation of the APTEL judgment dated 13.1.2026 in Appeal No. 399/2019 (NTPC v CERC & ors.) against the Commission’s order dated 28.8.2019 in Petition No. 46/MP/2018 (on remand).

And

In the matter of:

NTPC Limited NTPC Bhawan, Core-7, Scope Complex 7,

Institutional Area, Lodhi Road New Delhi-110003 …..Petitioner

Vs

1. Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited, P.O. Sundernagar, Danganiya, Raipur – 492013

2. Madhya Pradesh Power Management Company Limited, Sakti Bhawan, Vidyut Nagar, Rampur, Jabalpur – 110003

3. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company, Prakashgad, Bandra (East), Mumbai – 400051.

Order in Petition No. 46/MP/2018 (on remand) Page 1 of 11

##PAGE2##

4. Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited, Sardar Patel Vidyut Bhawan, Race Course, Vadodara Gujarat-390007

5. Electricity Department, Govt. Of Goa, Vidyut Bhawan, Panaji, Goa – 403001

6. Electricity Department, Administration of Daman & Diu, Daman – 396210

7. Electricity Department, Administration of Dadra & Nagar Haveli, Silvasa – 396230

8. A.P. Eastern Power Distribution Company Ltd., P&T Colony, Seethammadhara, Vishakapatnam – 503013

9. A.P. Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd., Tiruchanur Road, Kesavayana Gunta, Tirupati – 517501

10. Telangana Northern Power Distribution Company Ltd., H.No. 2-5-31/2, Vidyut Bhavan, Nakkalagutta,

Hanamkonda, Warangal – 506001

11. Telangana State Sourthern Power Distribution Company Ltd., Mint Compound, Corporate Office, Hyderabad – 500063.

12. Tamil Nadu Generation & Distribution Corporation Ltd., NPKRR Maaligai, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600002.

13. Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Ltd., Krishan Rajendra Circle,

Bangalore – 506001

14. Mangalore Electricity Supply Company Ltd., MESCOM Bhavana, Corporate Office Bejjaikevai Cross Road, Mangalore – 575004

15. Chamundeshwari Electricity Supply Company Ltd., Corporateoffice, No.29, Ground Floor, Kaveri Grameena Bank Road Vijayanagar 2nd Stage,

Mysore – 570017

16. Gulbarga Electricity Supply Company Ltd., Main Road, Gulbarga – 585102

17. Hubli Electricity Supply Company Ltd.

PB Raod, Hubli – 580025.

Order in Petition No. 46/MP/2018 (on remand) Page 2 of 11

##PAGE3##

18. Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd., Vaidyuthibhavana, Pattom,

Thiruvananthapuram – 695004 ….. Respondents

ORDER

The Petition No. 46/MP/2018 was filed by the Petitioner seeking relaxation of the normative NAPAF of 85% for FYs 2017-18 and 2018-19 in respect of Mouda Stage-I (2×500 MW), Mouda Stage-II (2×660 MW), Solapur TPS (2×660 MW) and Simhadri Stage- I (2×500 MW), and treatment of the shortfall between normative NAPAF and actual declared availability, attributable to inadequate coal supply from linked mines and restrictions on coal imports, as deemed generation for recovery of fixed charges under the proviso to Regulation 36(A) of the Tariff Regulations, 2014. The Commission, vide order

dated 28.8.2019, rejected the prayer, as under:

“…..

51. Further, the Commission in Petition No 68/MP/2018 w.r.t. NTECL vs APTRANSCO & 14 others, vide order dated 26.6.2019 has rejected the revision of NAPAF for Vallur Thermal Power Station (3X500MW) for the period from

01.04.2017 to 31.03.2019 with the following observations: -

“19. Further, the Commission in a similar prayer mad

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top