CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE
TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI
REGIONAL BENCH
Customs Appeal No. 85501 of 2022
(Arising out of Order-in-Original CAO No. 139/CAC/PCC(G)/SJ/CBS(Adj) dated
28.01.2022 passed by the Principal Commissioner of Customs (General),
Mumbai-I)
M/s. Hayatt Shipping Pvt. Ltd.
Appellant
Room No.20, 3rd Floor, Kashmiri House,
20/22, M.A. Sarang Marg,
Dongri, Mumbai 400 009.
Vs.
Commissioner of Customs (General), Mumbai Respondent
New Custom House, Ballard Estate, Mumbai 400 001.
Appearance:
Shri Anil Balani, Advocate, for the Appellant
Shri
Sydney
D’Silva,
Additional
Commissioner,
Authorised
Representative for the Respondent
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. SANJIV SRIVASTAVA, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
HON’BLE DR. SUVENDU KUMAR PATI, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
Date of Hearing: 23.01.2023
Date of Decision: 23.01.2023
FINAL ORDER NO. A/85308/2023
PER: SANJIV SRIVASTAVA
This appeal is directed against Order-in-Original CAO No.
139/CAC/PCC(G)/SJ/CBS(Adj) dated 28.01.2022 passed by the
Principal Commissioner of Customs (General), Mumbai-I, holding
as follows:-
I, Principal Commissioner of Customs (General), in exercise of
the power conferred upon me under Regulation 17(7) of the
CBLR, 2018, pass the following order:
(i) I hereby impose penalty of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty
Thousand only) on M/s. Hayatt Shipping Pvt. Ltd., CB No.
11/396 [PAN No. AAAFA3866E) under Regulation 18 of the
CBLR, 2018.
C/85501/2022
2
(ii) I hereby order for forfeiture of entire amount of security
deposit furnished by the CB, under Regulation 14 of the CBLR,
2018.
(iii) The CB License No.11/396 is ordered to be revoked under
Regulation 14 of the CBLR, 2018.
(iv) I hereby order that the CB surrender the original License as
well as all the 'F', 'G' & 'H' cards issued there under immediately
This order is passed without prejudice to any other action which
may be taken against the Customs Broker and their employees
under the Customs Act, 1962, or any other act for the time being
in force in the Union of India.”
2.1
Appellant is a Customs Broker having Customs Broker
Licence No. 11/396 (PAN No. AAAFA3866E). Information was
gathered that an import consignment of toys with misdeclaration
and concealment of cosmetics inside was attempted to be
cleared for home consumption with intent to evade customs duty
and other statutory provisions by M/s. Global Enterprises under
Bill of Entry No. 6026676 dated 18.04.2018 at Navkar
Corporation Ltd., JNPT, who has filed the said Bill of Entry.
Proceedings were initiated against the importer and against the
appellant – Customs Broker for revocation of their licence. The
licence of the Customs Broker was suspended vide order No.
42/2020-21
dated
16.02.2021
under
the
provisions
of
Regulation 16(1) of Custom Broker Licensing Regulations, 2018
and
the
said
suspension
was
revoked
pending
inquiry
proceedings
under
Regulation
17
of
CBLR,
2018
by
Commissioner of Customs (General), Mumbai vide order No.
52/2020-21 dated 15.03.2021 read with corrigendum dated
27.07.2021. A show cause notice dated 15.03.2021 was issued
to the Customs Broker under Regulation 17(1) of CBLR asking
them to show cause as to why the licence bearing No.11/396
issued to them should not be revoked and security deposit not
forfeited and/or penalty should not be imposed on them under
Regulation 14 read with Regulations 17 & 18 of CBLR, 2018.
Inquiry was made and the Inquiry Officer vide his report dated
C/85501/2022
3
16.09.2021 held as to the charges made against the Customs
Broker for violation of Regulations 10(a), 10(d), 10(e), 10(m)
and 10(n). Appellant contested the inquiry report and filed
written submissions vide letter dated 29.10.2021. After
considering
the
submissions,
Principal
Commissioner
has
proceeded to decide as per the impugned order referred in para
1 above. Aggrieved appellant has filed this appeal.
3.1
We have heard Shri Anil Balani, Advocate for the appellant
and Shri Sydney D’Silva, Additional Commissioner, Authorised
Representative for the Revenue.
3.2
Arguing for the appellant, learned counsel submits as
follows:-
There is no reference to any Offence Report in the above
orders.
The Enquiry Notice was issued on 15.03.2021 (Ex.-D). It
refers to and relies upon statements of the following
persons:-
(i) Mohd. Arfat Mehmood Mukadam, Director of the Appellants;
(ii) Santosh D. Gunjal, the person who referred the work;
(iii) Sahadeo B. Rade, Proprietor of Global Enterprise, the
importer firm;
(iv) Chandrashekar C. Rane;
(v) Irfan Popatiya; and
(vi) Amjad Bakall
In Advocate's letter dated 9.8.2021 (Ex.-E) (on page 92) It
is recorded that even the Enquiry Notice does not refer to
any Offence Report.
Advocate's letter dated 11.08.2021 (Ex-F) records that
statement of representative of The Greater Bombay Co-op.
Bank Ltd. and mail of the Branch Manager of the said Bank
were never supplied. It was prayed that cross-examination
C/85501/2022
4
of all persons must be granted after supplying the said
documents.
In Advocate's letter dated 29.10.2021 (Ex-H) application for
cross- examination of 7
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.