2023 Supreme(Online)(CESTAT) 457
CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE
TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI
REGIONAL BENCH
Excise Appeal No. 85044 of 2013
(Arising out of Order-in-Appeal No. BR/328-329/MI/2012 dated 25.09.2012
passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai Zone-I)
M/s. Microworld Software Services Pvt. Ltd.
Appellant
Plot No.80, Road No.15, MIDC, Marol,
Andheri (E), Mumbai 400 093.
Vs.
Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-I Respondent
115, New Central Excise Building, M.K. Road,
Churchgate, Mumbai 400 020.
AND
Excise Appeal No. 85045 of 2013
(Arising out of Order-in-Appeal No. BR/328-329/MI/2012 dated 25.09.2012
passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai Zone-I)
Govind Rammurthy
Appellant
Managing Director of
Microworld Software Services Pvt. Ltd.,
Plot No.80, Road No.15, MIDC, Marol,
Andheri (E), Mumbai 400 093.
Vs.
Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-I Respondent
115, New Central Excise Building, M.K. Road,
Churchgate, Mumbai 400 020.
Appearance:
Shri Rajesh Ostwal with Shri Saurabh Bhise, Advocates, for the
Appellant
Shri
Amrendra
Kumar
Jha,
Deputy
Commissioner,
Authorised
Representative for the Respondent
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. SANJIV SRIVASTAVA, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
HON’BLE DR. SUVENDU KUMAR PATI, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
Date of Hearing: 15.02.2023
Date of Decision: 15.02.2023
FINAL ORDER NO. 85752-85753/2023
PER: SANJIV SRIVASTAVA
These appeals are directed against the order in appeal No
BR/328-329/MI/2012
dated
25.09.2012/28.09.2012
of
the
E/85044,85045/2013
2
Commissioner (Appeals) Central Excise, Mumbai -I. By the
impugned order following has been held:
"I uphold the impugned order with modification that since the
appellant No 1 had already paid Rs 9,09,647/-, the same is
appropriated against the confirmed demand. Both the appeals
are rejected."
1.2
Original Authority has by his order held as follows:
69. In view of the above discussion and findings, I pass, the
following order.
After allowing the benefit of Cum duty price, I confirm the
demand of Central Excise Duty amounting to Rs.35,40,853/-
(Rupees Thirty Five Lakhs Forty Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty
Three only), Education Cess amounting to Rs.70,817/- (Rupees
Seventy Thousand Eight Hundred Seventeen), and Higher
Secondary Education Cess amounting to Rs.26.915/- (Rupees
Twenty Six Thousand Nine Hundred Fifteen only) payable by
them being Central Excise Duty, not paid on goods, as detailed
in Annexure 'A' to the Show Cause Cum Demand Notice, the
packaged software, internet download sales, as classifiable under
tariff item 8524 31 11 (as amended) manufactured and cleared
by them during the period April - 2006 to November, 2008,
under proviso to Section 11 A (1) of Central Excise Act, 1944,
and order for recovery of the amount from M/s. Microworld
Software Services Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai - 400 093.
I confirm and order recovery of interest at appropriate rate, from
M/s. Microworld Software Services Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai - 400 093,
under Section 11 AB of Central Excise Act - 1944.
I impose penalty of Rs.36,38,585/- (Rupees Thirty Six Lakhs
Thirty Eight Thousand Five Hundred Eighty Five only) on M/s.
Microworld Software Services Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai - 400 093,
under provisions of Section 11 AC of the Central Excise Act
1944.
Further, I impose a penalty of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees_One lakh
only) on Shri Govind Rammurthy, Managing Director of M/s.
Microworld Software Services Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai - 93, under Rule
26 of the Central Excise Rules-2002.”
3
2.1
The appellants are engaged in the manufacture and sale of
packaged information technology software on media like CD-
ROM or Disc. Till 1.3.2006, information technology software
recorded on media was exempted from Central Excise duty. With
effect from 1.3.2006, such information technology software
recorded on CD-ROM or disc or any other media was classifiable
under Tariff Item 8524 91 12 of the First Schedule to the Central
Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (Central Excise Tariff for short) and basic
excise duty @ 8% adv. was levied. With effect from 01.01.2007,
the aforesaid Tariff Item No. was changed to 8523 80 20 which
covered information technology software recorded on any media
and attracted central excise duty @ 8% adv.
2.2
Appellants paid Central excise duty at applicable rate on
packaged software sold in CD-ROM or disc after availing small
scale exemption in terms of Notification No. 8/2003-CE dated
1.3.2003, as amended by Notification No. 8/2006-CE dated
1.3.2006.
2.3 Revenue authorities were of the view that the software
sales made electronically through internet download were also
goods since sales tax on software sold through internet
download was discharged by the appellants. It was alleged that
the software sold through internet was packaged software and
not customized software and therefore, benefit in terms of
Notification No.6/2006-CE dated 1.3.2006 was not available. A
show cause notice dated 17.11.2009 was issued to the appellant
2.4
The show cause notice was adjudicated by the original
authority as per the order in original referred in para 1.2 above.
Appeal
filed
by
appellants
was
dismissed
by
Commissioner (Appeal) as per the impugned order hence this
appeal.
3.1
We have heard Shri Rajesh Ostwal with Shri Saurabh
Bhise, Advocates for the Appellants and Shri Amrendra Kumar
Jha Deputy Commissioner, authorized representative for the
revenue.
3.2
Arguing for the appellants learned counsel submits:
The software downloads are not excisable goods covered under
Section 2(d) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and hence are not
4
liable to levy of Central Excise duty under Section 3 of the
Central Excise Act.
The Finance Minister's speeches while introducing Budget 2006-
07 and Budget 2008-09 support the above submissions.
When software is downloaded from / through internet, there is
general consensus that none of the provisions of Customs