2024 Supreme(Online)(CESTAT) 415
CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
ALLAHABAD
REGIONAL BENCH - COURT NO.I
Service Tax Appeal No.70300 of 2017
(Arising out of Order-in-Original No.14/Commissioner/ST/Noida/2016-17
dated 09/02/2017 passed by Commissioner of Service Tax, Noida)
M/s Sahara Sanchaar Limited,
…..Appellant
(C-2,3,4, Sahara India Complex,
Sector-11, Noida-201301)
VERSUS
Commissioner of Service Tax, Noida
….Respondent
(Commissionerate, Noida)
APPEARANCE:
Shri Mehul Jivani, Chartered Accountant for the Appellant
Shri Manish Raj, Authorised Representative for the Respondent
CORAM:
FINAL ORDER NO.70011/2024
DATE OF HEARING
:
03 October, 2023
DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT :
03 January, 2024
SANJIV SRIVASTAVA:
This
appeal
is
directed
against
in
original
No
14/Commissioner/ Service Tax/ NOIDA/ 201617 dated 09.02
2017 of the Commissioner Service tax NOIDA. By the impugned
order following has been held:
―ORDER
(i)
I hereby confirm the demand of the service tax
amounting to Rs.9,00,01,588/- (Rupees Nine Crores
One Thousand Five Hundred Eighty Eight only) as raised
in the show cause notice invoking the proviso to Section
73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994 and order M/s. Sahara
Sanchaar Limited, C-2,3,4, Sahara India Complex,
HON’BLE MR. P.K. CHOUDHARY, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
HON’BLE MR. SANJIV SRIVASTAVA, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
Service Tax Appeal No.70300 of 2017
2
Sector-11, Noida to pay the same in terms of provisions
under Section 73(2) of the Act, ibid
(ii)
I further impose a penalty of Rs.9,00,01,588/- (Rupees
Nine Crores One Thousand Five Hundred Eighty Eight
only) under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 upon
M/s. Sahara Sanchaar Limited, C-2,3,4, Sahara India
Complex, Sector-11, Noida
(iii)
I also disallow the CENVAT credit of Rs.2,27,05,076/-
(Rupees Two Crores Twenty Seven Lakhs Five Thousand
and Seventy Six only) as proposed in the show cause
notice under Rule 14 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004
read with the proviso to Section 73(1) of the Act, ibid,
and order M/s. Sahara Sanchaar Limited, C-2,3,4,
Sahara India Complex, Sector-11, Noida to pay the
same along with interest under Rule 14 of the CENVAT
Credit Rules, 2004 read with Section 73(2) of the
Finance Act, 1994
(iv)
I further impose a penalty of Rs. 2,27,05,076/- (Rs.
Two Crores Twenty Seven Lakhs Five Thousand and
Seventy Six only) under Rule 15(3) of the CENVAT
Credit Rules, 2004 read with Section 78 of the Finance
Act, 1994 on M/s. Sahara Sanchaar Limited, C-2,3,4,
Sahara India Complex, Sector-11, Noida.
(v)
I also order to recover the interest under Section 75 of
the Finance Act, 1994 from M/s. Sahara Sanchaar
Limited, C-2, 3, 4, Sahara India Complex, Sector-11,
Noida on the confirmed demand amounts as per sl. (i) &
(iii) above
(vi)
I further impose a total penalty of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees
Ten Thousand Only) on M/s. Sahara Sanchaar Limited,
C-2,3,4, Sahara India Complex, Sector-11, Noida under
Section 77(1)(a) and Section 77(2) of the Finance Act,
1994
The above adjudged dues should be paid forthwith by the party.‖
Service Tax Appeal No.70300 of 2017
3
2.1 Acting on the intelligence that the Appellant was evading
service tax payment on supply of the tangible goods services,
the business premises of the appellant was visited/ searched on
20.3.2015.
2.2
During the course of search proceedings, it was noticed
that the party has leased out earth station and other equipment
and related infrastructure to have up linking facility of T.V
Programs to their sister concern namely M/s Sahara India
Commercial Corporation Limited (herein after referred to as "the
SICCL". Statement of Ms Santosh Khandelwal, the Cost
accountant and company secretary was recorded on the spot.
2.3
After scrutiny of the agreements and other related
documents and after making necessary enquiries it was
observed that appellant has shown income from lease rent of
Rs.82.62 Crores as per the balance sheet and profit/loss account
statement of the party for the financial years 2009-10, 2010-11,
2011-12, 2012-13 and 2013-14. On this income appellant was
required to pay service under the category of “Supply of Tangible
Goods Services”. Thus appellant evaded payment of service tax
as indicated in the table below:
Financial
Year
Revenue from lease
rent
Rate of Service
Tax
Service
Tax
payable
2009-10
35,34,09,423
10.30%
3,64,01,171
2010-11
11,67,81,184
10.30%
1,20,28,462
2011-12
11,82,38, 189
10.30%
1,21,78,533
2012-13
11,82,38, 189
12.36%
1,46,14,240
2013-14
11,95,72,665
12.36%
1,47,79,181
Total
82,62,39,650
9,00,01,588
It was observed that the appellant had knowingly evaded
payment of the service tax on rental income/ lease income of
earth station and related equipment. They have in their ST-3
returns for financial year 2