CUSTOMS EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
S.K. Mohanty, J, M.M. Parthiban, Technical Member
Prakash Jokhani – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. main issues around eligibility and applicability of regulations. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 2. addendum issuance time limits and relevance to the original scn. (Para 9) |
| 3. final ruling on cenvat credit eligibility and addendum's legal position. (Para 10) |
PER: M.M. PARTHIBAN
Pursuant to the remand directions contained in the Orders dated 11.07.2024, 18.02.2025 and 08.07.2025 passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay in Central Excise Appeal No.35 of 2022, this appeal is being taken up for hearing.
2.1 Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the Order-in-Original No. 03/MS-03/Th-I/2009 dated 31.03.2009 (for short, referred to, as ‘the impugned order’), passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane-I, both the assessee-appellant as well as the Revenue had filed appeals before the Tribunal, which were disposed of vide common Final Order No. A/85237-85240/2022 dated 28.03.2022, in the following manner:
(i) Appeal No. E/843/2009 was partly allowed by reducing the penalty imposed on Shri Prakash Jokhani from Rs.20,00,000/- to Rs.5,00,000/-;
(ii) Appeal No. E/844/2009 were also partly allowed by holding that the CENVAT credit availed after revocation of Rule 12B with effect fro
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.