SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CESTAT) 143

CUSTOMS EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
P.K. Choudhary, J
M/s CONCOR CFS – Appellant
Versus
Principal Commissioner of Customs, Noida – Respondent
Customs Appeal No.70635/2025 | Customs Appeal No.70636/2025 | Customs Appeal No.70637/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri Nishant Mishra
For the Respondents: Ms. Chitra Srivastava

Penalties under the Customs Act cannot be imposed without clear evidence of intent to defraud or wrongdoing.

Headnote:The appeals arise from penalties imposed under various provisions of the Customs Act, 1962. The facts indicate that the appellants were involved in handling customs processes for loaded containers, which were misclassified. The adjudicating authority found the appellants in violation, but the court determined the reliance on inadmissible evidence justified reversing penalties. Key issues included the misapplication of penalties under the Act's specific sections and the necessity of following due evidence procedures. The court ruled the penalties imposed were unwarranted, given the lack of intent to defraud.

Table of Content
1. multiple appeals arise from a single order regarding penalty imposition. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. appellants' challenge relies on procedural irregularities. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. arguments regarding evidence sufficiency for penalty assessments. (Para 11 , 12)
4. court’s evaluation of evidentiary standards for penalties. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
5. final conclusions regarding the inadequacy and misuse of evidence. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
6. the order is set aside, concluding the appellants were unfairly penalized. (Para 22)

FINAL ORDER NOs.- 70009-70011/2026

DATE OF HEARING : 19.11.2025

DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 12.01.2026

Customs Appeal No.70635/2025 has been preferred by M/s CONCOR CFS, Act Appellant No.1 challenging the Order-in-Original No.12/PC/NOIDA-CUS/2024-25 dated 28.03.2025, to the extent of imposition of penalties of Rs.50,000/-, Rs.2,50,000/-, Rs.2,50,000/- & Rs.50,000/- under Regulation 12(8) of the Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations, 2009 , Section 114AA , Section 117 & Section 158 (2) respectively of the Customs Act, 1962 , APPEARANCE

2. Customs Appeal No.70636/2025 has been preferred by Shri O. Sairam, Appellant No.2, to the extent of imposition of penalty of Rs.50,000/- under Section 114AA of the Act.

3. Customs Appeal No.70637/2025 has been preferred by Shri Subodh Kumar, Appellant No.3, the Assistant Manager (Commercial and Operation) of Appellant No.1, to the extent of imposition of penalty of Rs.50,000/- under Section 114AA of the Act.

4. Since the aforesaid three appeals arise out of the common Show Cause Notice, SCN CORAM: HON’BLE MR. P.K. CHOUDHARY, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) dated 31.03.2023 and common Order-in- Original No.12/PC/NOIDA-CUS/2024-25 dated 28.03.2025 hence, all the three appeals are heard together.

5. The Appellant No.1 is a public sector undertaking engaged in transportation and handling of containers and during the relevant time, the Appellant No.1 was also maintaining Container Freight Station, CFS at Inland Container Depot, ICD, Dadri U.P. The Appellant No.2 & 3 are employees of Appellant No.1 and during the relevant time were working as Assistant Manager (Commercial and Operation) of Appellant No.1.

6. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are such that on 15.11.2018 at around 10:59 Hrs., the staff of the Appellant No.1 in EXIM-Cell issued Entry Permits numbers EPC181115005 & EPC181115006, for two loaded containers bearing numbers BMOU5791210 & SEGU5336240, on the basis of letter dated 15.11.2018 of Shipping Line namely M/s Star Shipping Services (India) Ltd. and check list for Shipping Bill dated 14.11.2018 having name of exporter M/s R.D. IMPEX Pvt. Ltd. bearing stamp of customs broker namely M/s Zen Cargo logistics. The said two entry permits were generated under Entry Permit for Container, EPC on the request of shipping line for export off-loading of loaded containers. The two containers arrived at the gate of CONCOR CFS ICD Dadri on 16.11.2018 and entry was done at around 02:40 Hrs. on 16.11.2018.

7. It is the case of Appellants that one Shri Vinod Kumar Dubey of M/s Star Carrier (customs broker) approached the employees of the Appellant No.1 on 16.11.2018 representing that the two containers in question were meant for customs clearance at All Cargo Logistics CFS, ICD, Dadri and the same were mistakenly entered into CONCOR by the transporter as both CONCOR and All Cargo Logistics has the same code i.e. IN- DER6. On the representation so made, Shri Vinod Kumar Dubey requested that the two containers be moved out of CONCOR for shifting to All Cargo Logistics, CFS, ICD Dadri.

8. As per the Appellants, Shri Vinod Kumar Dubey was requested to produce permission of the Customs Authorities and was also required to pay dues of Appellant No.1 for handling/storage and additional charges for containers. On the request so made, Shri Vinod Kumar Dubey requested the employees of the Appellant No.1 to provide calculation of dues, for which purpose the employees of Appellant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top