SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CESTAT) 256

CUSTOMS EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
P. Dinesha, J, M. Ajit Kumar, Technical Member
M/s. Mylan Laboratories Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Customs – Respondent
Customs Appeal No.42255 of 2015 | Customs Appeal No. 41973/2015 | Customs Appeal No. 42253/2015 | Customs Appeal No.42281/2015



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri Y. Ravikumar, Shri S. Murugappan, Shri T. Sundaranathan
For the Respondents: Ms. Anandalakshmi Ganeshram

Appellants not liable for customs duty due to payment made through CHA, fraud responsibility lies with CHA.

Headnote:This appeal challenges the impugned Order-in-Original No.40603/2015, directing the primary appellant to pay customs duty due to alleged substitution of imported goods by the Custom House Agent. The court found errors in assumptions against the appellant while noting the fraudulent activities of the CHA. The findings highlight their lack of intention to evade duty due to established payments made via demand drafts. The Tribunal ultimately ruled favorably for the appellants.

Table of Content
1. appellants filed an appeal against customs duties due to issues related to their clearing agent. (Para 1 , 2)
2. argument presented by the appellants regarding payment handling by their clearing agent. (Para 3)
3. court observed fraudulent involvement of the clearing agent and established that duties were paid. (Para 4 , 5)
4. the court justified that findings from precedent cases validate the appellants' claims. (Para 6)
5. final decision sets aside the demand and penalties on the appellants. (Para 8)

Per: Shri P. Dinesha

These Appeals are filed against a common impugned Order-in-Original No.40603/2015 dated 30.07.2015 passed by Commissioner of Customs, Chennai; since the issue involved in all these Appeals is identical, these Appeals are bunched together for common disposal.

2. Facts as we could gather from the impugned Order-in- Original dated 30.07.2015 and the Show Cause Notice 12.04.2000 inter-alia, are that:

2.1 Revenue’s case is that their Intelligence has gathered that the raw material imported for manufacture of bulk drugs by some drug manufacturers were allowed for warehousing under Section 59 of the Customs Act, 1962 and same was substituted with fake materials and that the original material was sent to the importers by the CHA, M/s. Far Port International, Chennai, without payment of duty. It was also gathered that such substituted fake material was still lying under customs bonded warehouses pending clearance.

2.2 The scrutiny of the records maintained at Bonds Department (Customs) and warehouses located at C.W.C., Thiruvottiyur, ICBC - I, Manali, ICBC - II, Tollgate revealed that there were four time-expired bonds in respect of the importers M/s. Vera Laboratories Ltd., Hyderabad (1st Appellant herein, now known as Mylon Laboratories Ltd.) as given below:-

Sl. No.Bond No. & DateWarehouseRemarks
13827/17.4.95CWC, ThiruvottiyurValidity expired on 16.4.96.
23836/17.4.95-do-Validity expired on 16.4.96.
311517/06.10.95-do-Validity expired on 05.10.96.
414387/12.11.95-do-Validity expired on 11.11.96.

2.3 The goods lying in the above warehouse were examined in detail by the officers of SIIB, Custom House, Chennai in the presence of representatives of the Importer and CHA, and representative samples were drawn for the purpose of testing. Accordingly, the goods covered under pending bonds were seized in accordance with the provisions of Customs Act, 1962 .

2.4 The samples drawn were tested at the Customs House Laboratory, Chennai and as per the test report two pending Bond Nos. 3827/17.4.95 and 3836/17.4.95 contained (substituted and fake material) "Calcium Carbonate with Traces of Silica" as compared to the original imported material viz., 3,4,5 Trimethoxy Benzal Dehyde. Goods in respect of Bond No. 11517 dated 06.10.95 containing Thiophene and Bond No. 14387 dated 12.11.95 containing Triazole 1,2,4 1H were in original condition and the Importers have informed that they are in the process of clearing the same.

2.5 A list of 184 Bills of Entry along with the copies obtained from M/s. Vera Laboratories Ltd., Hyderabad (1st Appellant) pertaining to clearances made through Custom House, Chennai has been forwarded by Assistant Commissioner, SIIB, Air Cargo Complex, Chennai. The Bills of Entry were scrutinized with reference to cash numbers available on each of the Bill of Entry and as per the entries in the cash registers at Custom House, Chennai. It was found that the cash numbers available on two ex-bond Bills of Entry Nos. 4165 dated 18.4.95 and 5720 dated 22.5.95 pertaining to the above two bonds i.e., No. 3827 dated 17.4.95 and 3836 dated 17.4.95 were incorrect. On verification, it was noticed that these cash numbers pertain to payments made by some other importers for paying duty on their imports. It was also noticed that the above two Bills of Entry though filed and assessed, the Customs duty endorsements were forged by affixing fabricated rubber stamps and indicating unconnected cash numbers. These two ex-bond B

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top