SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CESTAT) 388

CUSTOMS EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
ANIRUDH VERMA – Appellant
Versus
MUMBAI-PREV – Respondent


CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI WEST ZONAL BENCH CUSTOMS APPEAL NO: 85156 OF 2026 [Arising out of Order-in-Appeal No: MUM-CSTM-PAX-APP-487 to 849/2023-24 dated 21st September 2023 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Mumbai – III.]

Anirudh Verma RE-8, Raghunathpur House Complex, Near Avenue Nursing Home, VIP Road, Kolkata … Appellant versus Commissioner of Customs (Preventive)

New Customs House, Ballard Estate, Mumbai - 400001 …Respondent APPEARANCE:

Shri Vineet Singh, Advocate for the appellant Shri CS Vinod, Assistant Commissioner (AR) for the respondent CORAM:

HON’BLE MR C J MATHEW, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) HON’BLE MR AJAY SHARMA, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

FINAL ORDER NO: 85156/2026 DATE OF HEARING: 08/01/2026 DATE OF DECISION: 27/01/2026 PER: C J MATHEW There can be no two opinions that, after amendment1 of 129E of Customs Act, 1962, appeal is maintainable before the Commissioner of

1 [Finance (No. 2) Act, 2014 dated 6th August 2014]

Customs (Appeals) or the Tribunal only upon deposit of prescribed percentage of duty and penalty or percentage of penalty, as the case may be. The decision2 of the Hon’ble Supreme in Chandra Sekhar Jha v. Union of India leaves no r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top