CUSTOMS EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
FAIZAN TEXTURISING – Appellant
Versus
CGST & Central Excise Vadodara II – Respondent
E/10117/2024
##PAGE1##
CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
WEST ZONAL BENCH : AHMEDABAD
REGIONAL BENCH - COURT NO. 2
EXCISE Appeal No. 10117 of 2024-SM
[ Arising out of Order-in-Appeal No. VAD-EXCUS-002-APP-228-2023-24 dated 20.09.2023
passed by Commissioner (Appeals) CGST & Central Excise, Vadodara]
M/s. Faizan Texturising …. Appellant
Unit-II, Plot No. 1705/A, GIDC Estate, Ankleshwar,
Distt. Bharuch - 393002
VERSUS
Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise, Vadodara .... Respondent
First Floor, Annex, GST Bhavan, Race Course Circle,
Vadodara-390 007 Gujarat
APPEARANCE :
Shri Rahul Gajera, Advocate for the Appellant
Smt. Sunita Menon, Superintendent (AR) for the Revenue.
CORAM:
HON’BLE DR. AJAYA KRISHNA VISHVESHA, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
DATE OF HEARING : 23.01.2026
DATE OF DECISION: 29.01.2026
FINAL ORDER NO. 10052/2026
DR. AJAYA KRISHNA VISHVESHA :
This appeal has been preferred by the appellant aggrieved by the
impugned Order-in-Appeal No. VAD-EXCUS-002-APP-228-2023-24 dated
20.09.2023 passed by Commissioner (Appeals), CGST & Central Excise,
Vadodara.
2. The facts of the case in brief are that two Show Cause Notices dated
31.03.2008 and 07.04.2008 were issued to the appellant and both the Show
Cause Notices were confirmed vide Orders-in-Original dated 10.03.2014.
Aggrieved with this Order-in-Original dated 10.03.2014, the appellant filed
appeal before the Tribunal and the Bench vide order dated 07.07.2015
remanded the matter for re-adjudication. In de-novo proceedings, the
Adjudicating Authority again confirmed the demand of both the Show Cause
##PAGE2##2
Appeal No. E/10117/2024-SM
Notices vide Orders-in-Original dated 29.12.2016. The appellant again
preferred appeal before the Tribunal and the Tribunal vide Final Order No.
A/10320-10323/2022 and A/10324-10327/2022 both dated 11.04.2022 set-
aside both the impugned orders and allowed the appeals with consequential
relief. Accordingly, the appellant vide letter dated 26.07.2022 filed a refund
application of deposit amount of Rs. 28,60,546/- which included pre-deposit
of Rs. 5,94,000/-. The appellant submitted xerox copies of challans, Orders
of the Tribunal with their refund claim. However, as per verification by the
Range Officer, Range-II, Division IX, Ankleshwar, the refund of pre-deposit
of Rs. 5,82,000/- was sanctioned. Refund of Rs. 3,27,153/- which was paid
voluntary by the appellant and appropriated by the Adjudicating Authority
vide Order-in-Original dated 29.12.2016 was also sanctioned. The
remaining amount of Rs. 19,51,393/- was not sanctioned as the Range
Superintendent vide his letter dated 08.08.2022 reported that due to non-
legibility of the TR-6 challans, the payment made by the appellant in respect
of the said challans cannot be ascertained. The department also approached
Bank of Baroda, Surat and Ankleshwar, vide letter dated 29.08.2022 to
ascertain the genuineness of the challans from their record. The Bank of
Baroda informed that such records are not available with them as the period
of retention of record for TDS/Challans/ various returns, submitted to tax
authorities is 10 years only. On the basis of the reply of Bank of Baroda, the
Adjudicating Authority entertained a view that they are not sure whether the
payments made by the appellant are in respect of the present case or
otherwise. Accordingly, out of total claim of Rs. 28,60,546/- only Rs.
9,09,153/- was sanctioned and the remaining claim of Rs. 19,51,393/- was
rejected by the Adjudicating Authority under Section 11B of the Central
Excise Act, 1944. Interest on the refund amount, as claimed by the
appellant under Section 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was also not
sanctioned. Aggrieved with the said order passed by learned Adjudicating
Authority, the appellant filed appeal before the learned Commissioner
(Appeals).
2.1 The learned Commissioner (Appeals), considering the CESTAT order,
Circular No. 984/02/2014-CX dated 16.08.2014 and the provisions of
Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 allowed the refund claim partly
for Rs. 18,04,031/- (Rs. 15,04,031/- + Rs
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.