SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CESTAT) 520

CUSTOMS EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
R. Muralidhar, Judicial Member, K. Anpazhakan, Technical Member
Krishna Gopal Rathi – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of C.G.S.T. and Central Excise – Respondent
Excise Appeal No. 77133 of 2018



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Nilotpal Chowdhury, Daraksha F. Khan
For the Respondents: S.K. Jha

Penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, is attracted when a person knowingly facilitates the availment of fraudulent CENVAT credit by issuing excise invoices without the physical delivery of goods, especially where lack of infrastructure renders the purported manufacturing activity commercially non-viable.

Headnote:(A) Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Rule 26 - Imposition of penalty for issuing invoices without physical delivery of goods - Appellant alleged to have facilitated fraudulent CENVAT credit by issuing paper invoices for 'TMT Bar Cutting/MS Round Cutting' while having no infrastructure for manufacturing or transportation - Whether penalty under Rule 26 is sustainable where evidence suggests paper transactions to facilitate ineligible tax benefits.

Facts of the case:
The appellant, a Director of a registered steel dealer, was penalized by excise authorities for issuing invoices for 'TMT Bar Cutting' without actual supply of goods. Investigations revealed the appellant lacked electricity and sufficient godown space to perform cutting activities. Additionally, vehicle records showed no movement of goods as claimed, and transport owners denied the transactions. The main manufacturer had already settled duty and penalty under VCES.

Findings of Court:
The Tribunal upheld the finding that the appellant facilitated fraudulent CENVAT credit through fictitious transactions. However, noting the appellant's limited role, the penalty was reduced from Rs. 10,00,000 to Rs. 1,00,000.

Issues: Whether the appellant is liable for penalty under Rule 26 for issuing invoices without delivery of goods and whether the evidence of fictitious transactions is sufficient to sustain the penalty.

Ratio Decidendi: Penalty under Rule 26 is attracted when a person issues invoices without delivery of goods, facilitating ineligible tax benefits. Where material evidence—such as lack of infrastructure, absence of electricity, and corroborating statements from transporters—clearly indicates the transaction was non-viable and fictitious, the involvement in abetting fraudulent CENVAT credit through paper transactions is sufficient to impose a penalty.

Result: Appeal allowed in part; penalty reduced.

Table of Content
1. overview of allegations regarding fictitious steel sales and fraudulent credit. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. arguments comparing the viability of goods movement vs documentary proof. (Para 8 , 9)
3. analysis of evidence supporting the finding of invoice-only transactions. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
4. quantum of penalty reduced based on limited role and evidence. (Para 14 , 15)

ORDER: [PER SHRI K. ANPAZHAKAN]

The present appeal has been filed by Shri Krishna Gopal Rathi, Director of M/s. Rathi Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd., 27, Brabourne Road, 7th Floor, 704, Kolkata – 700 001, against the imposition of penalty of Rs.10,00,000/- under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 vide the Order-in-Original No. 80/JC/CE/DGP/2016-17 dated 30.12.2016, which has been upheld by the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals), Goods & Service Tax, Siliguri in the Order-in-Appeal No. 198-200/DGP-CEX/2018 dated 15.03.2018.

2. The facts of the case are that M/s. Rathi Steels Industries Pvt. Ltd., Godown No. 4, P.T.R. Siding, Coal Depot, Shalimar, Shibpur, Howrah-711 102 having Central Excise Registration No. AABCR2848HXD001 is a registered Dealer under the jurisdiction of Range-II, Howrah South-1 Division, Kolkata-II Commissionerate. They are engaged in supplying of "TMT Bar Cutting/MS Round Cutting" purchased from various manufacturers and passing on CENVAT Credit involved therein.

3. During investigation of the documents of M/s Rathi Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd., it has been noticed that the said supplier has been issuing Excise invoices describing the goods as "TMT Bar Cutting/MS Round cutting" whereas they have shown to have purchased "TMT Bars/MS Round" from various manufacturers. It was alleged that they were receiving "TMT Bar/MS Round" and after cutting the same were sold to different buyers mentioning it in invoices as "TMT Bar Cutting/MS Round Cutting" but the Central Excise Tariff Sub-Heading 72141090 of "TMT Bar" and "TMT Bar cutting" was deliberately mentioned/retained in the invoices issued by M/s Rathi Steel Industries Ltd. so as to camouflage and to pass on CENVAT Credit fraudulently. It was also alleged that by cutting 'TMT Bars' into pieces, M/s Rathi Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd. have condemned a prime quality finished goods into waste and scrap which falls under different tariff sub heading under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; that in open market price of waste and scrap is always far less than the price of good quality 'TMT Bar' but surprisingly in this case of 'TMT Bar cutting' i.e. waste & scrap is higher than the price of 'TMT Bar'. As that time price of waste & scrap in open market was Rs. 8,000/- to Rs. 10,000/- per MT whereas M/s Shyam Sel& Power Ltd. have purchased 'TMT Bar Cutting' from M/s Rathi Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd. at Rs. 27,700/MT as evident from Invoice No. 941 Dated 16.01.2011 of M/s Rathi Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd. Further, it was also found that they have used the same as raw material to manufacture their finished goods i.e. MS Billet which they have sold at Rs. 22,935/MT. The investigating officers were of the view that a high value material like "TMT Bar Cutting" cannot be used as scrap/raw material by any prudent manufacturer for manufacturing a low value finished goods. Therefore, the above-mentioned transaction appeared to be fictitious and mere paper transaction as the same was commercially non-viable. An allegation was also levelled that this modus-operandi has been adopted only to facilitate the buyer/manufacturer to avail fake/paper credit. It was also noticed that the goods i.e. "TMT Bar/MS Round" are delivered to different buyers on the same day or after a day on receiving of "TMT Bar/MS Round" to the dealer’s i.e., M/s Rathi Steels Industries Pvt. Ltd. premises; that the dealer does not have adequate space or infrastructure and electric connection at their premises to cut such a huge quantum of TMT Bars in their premises within a very short time.

4. As per the statement of Shri Krishna Gopal Rathi,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top