SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CESTAT) 69

CUSTOMS EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
SANDOZ PVT LTD – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER CGST AND CENTRAL EXCISE-BELAPUR – Respondent


CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI WEST ZONAL BENCH CUSTOMS APPEAL NO: 89916 OF 2014 [Arising out of Order-in-Original No: Belapur/11/Bel-I/R-IV/COMMR/KA/ 2014- 15 dated 14, [order-in-original no. Belapur/11/Bel-I/R-IV/COMMR/KA/ 2014-15dated 14th August 2014] August 2014 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Belapur.]

Sandoz Pvt Ltd Plot No.D-31/32 TTC Industrial Area, Turbhe Navi Mumbai – 400705 … Appellant versus Commissioner of Central Excise Belapur CGO Complex, CBD Belapur, Navi Mumbai – 400614 …Respondent APPEARANCE:

Shri Prakash Shah, Sr Advocate along with Shri Mohit Raval and Shri Ananta Khandait, Advocates, Advocate for the appellant Shri Badhe Piyush, Deputy Commissioner (AR) for the respondent CORAM:

HON’BLE MR C J MATHEW, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) HON’BLE MR AJAY SHARMA, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

FINAL ORDER NO: 85900/2025 DATE OF HEARING: 12/12/2024 DATE OF DECISION: 05/06/2025 PER: C J MATHEW Though the impugned order1 of Commissioner of Central

Excise, Belapur has directed recovery of ₹ 57,53,198, being the duty foregone on ‘packing material’ and ‘other inputs’ procured for manufacture of ‘cephalosporins’ and ‘carbapenems’, by enforcement of bond executed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top