SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

CUSTOMS EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Sanjiv Srivastava, Technical Member
Naim Singh – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise & CGST, Kanpur – Respondent
Service Tax Appeal No.70073 of 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Stuti Saggi, S.P. Ojha
For the Respondents: Abhishek Mukharjee, Prashant Kumar

Receipts established as payments for the supply of goods, corroborated by VAT assessments, are not subject to service tax, and service providers are entitled to threshold exemptions under Service Tax notifications if their taxable turnover remains below the prescribed limit of Rs. 10 Lakhs.

Headnote:(A) Finance Act, 1994 - Section 65B(44), 66B, 69, 70, 73, 77, 78 - Service Tax - Threshold exemption - Appellant challenged confirmation of service tax on supply of materials (stone ballast and stone dust) and legal expenses - Court found that evidence of VAT assessment was provided, confirming these transactions were outside the scope of service tax - Threshold criteria for exemption under Notification No. 33/2012-ST were met as taxable turnover remained below Rs. 10 Lakhs - Demand regarding legal fees was not contested. (Paras 4.3, 4.5, 4.6)

Facts of the case:
The appellant provided construction services to government departments and also supplied materials. The department alleged short payment of service tax on these transactions and categorized certain expenses as legal fees subject to reverse charge. The Commissioner (Appeals) partially upheld the demand, confirming liability on four supply instances due to lack of documentation and on legal expenditures.

Findings of Court:
The documents submitted, including VAT assessment orders, confirmed that the disputed receipts were for supply of materials, not taxable services. Furthermore, after excluding these non-taxable receipts, the appellant's turnover remained below the threshold exemption level of Rs. 10 Lakhs. The demand regarding legal fees remained uncontested by the appellant.

Issues: Whether receipts for supply of materials against specific work orders are taxable under the Finance Act, 1994, and whether the appellant qualifies for threshold exemption.

Ratio Decidendi: If valid VAT assessment proves transactions are for the supply of goods, they cannot be taxed as service provisions; additionally, if the taxable turnover after proper exclusions falls below the statutory threshold, the service tax demand against the noticee is unsustainable.

Result: Appeal allowed.

SANJIV SRIVASTAVA:

This appeal is directed against Order-in-Appeal No.757-ST/Alld/2022 dated 27/02/2023 passed by Commissioner (Appeals) Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax, Allahabad. By the impugned order following has been held:-

“5. In view of the above, I modify the impugned Order dated 26.05.2022, as under:

(i) Confirm demand of Service Tax (including Cesses) is reduced to Rs. 60,676/-along with interest;

(ii) Imposition of penalty under Section 78 of the Act is reduced to Rs. 60,676/-.

(iii) Penalty imposed under Section 77(1) (a) 77(1) (c) 77(1) (d), 77(2) and under Section 70 of the Ace read with Rule 7(C) of the Service Tax-Rules, 1994 in the impugned order shall remain unchanged.”

1.2 Earlier appeal filed by the appellant was dismissed on the ground of maintainability as the disputed amount of service tax involved in the appeal is Rs.60,676/-, much below the amount of Rs.2 lakhs as per second proviso to Section 35B(1). However, Hon’ble High Court vide order dated 27.01.2026 in Central Excise Appeal No 3 of 2026 remanded the matter to the Tribunal.

2.1 Appellant is engaged in providing taxable services as defined by Section 65B(44) of the Finance Act, 1994 and are liable to pay service tax as per the provisions of Section 66B ibid. Appellant had not obtained Service Tax Registration as required under Section 69 of the Finance Act, 1994.

2.2 On the basis of the information received from Income Tax Department, it was observed that appellant has provided taxable services during the F.Y. 2015-16 but have not paid due service tax.

2.3 Inquiries were initiated and appellant vide letter dated 07.11.2019 was asked to provide the documents i.e. Form ST-2; details of nature of work/services provided; ST-3 returns, Bills Invoice/ Job-work bills issued towards services provided, Form 26AS, Balance Sheets along with Profit & Loss A/c, Income Tax returns along with computation/calculation of Income: Reconciliation of amount received under different Sections of Income Tax [excluding Sec 194A] in Form-26AS vis-à-vis taxable value of services reflected in ST-3 returns along with reasons for difference, if any, Reconciliation of amount reflected under the head of 'Revenue from Operations' in Balance sheet/Computation of Income vis-à-vis taxable value of services reflected in ST-3 returns along with reasons for difference, if any and any other relevant related documents in respect of service provided for the period from April. 15to June, 17.

2.4 Appellant vide letter dated 23.12.2019 submitted that during the relevant period they have received works contract for services provided by way of construction of road which are exempt from payment of service tax, the same are reproduced as under-

S.N. Period/F.Y. Name of the Department (M/s.) Amount in Rs.
1. 2015-16 Ex. Eng. ConstDiv, PWDMainpuri 8,57,650
2. 2015-16 Ex. Eng. Prov, Div, PWDMainpuri 61,88,385
3. 2015-16 Sub-total 70,46,035
4. 2016-17 Ex. Eng. ConstDiv, PWDMainpuri 40,14,597
5. 2016-17 Ex. Eng. Prov.Div, PWDMainpuri 24,88,730
6. 2016-17 Sub-total 65,03,327
7. Apr 17 to Jun 17 No Payment Till the date 0
8. Apr 17 to Jun 17 Sub-total 0
9. Apr 17 to Jun 17 Total 1,35,49,362

2.5 Further, correspondences were made and appellant was asked to provide Work orders/ Contracts/ Agreements made with the service recipients. However, no response was received. Hence, appellant failed to produce other related records duly maintained by them during their business activities. Accordingly, on the basis of available information provided by the Income Tax Authorities, appellant short paid service tax has been computed as detailed in tables below:-

Service Tax Payable

Period Taxable value Service Tax (Inclusive of Cess)
1 2 3
Apr'15 to May 15 931981 115193
01.06.15 to 14.11.15 2662673 372774
15.11.15 to 31.03.16 1337571 193948
Apr 16 to May'16 555240 80510
Jun 16 to Mar'17 3997089 599562
Apr '17 to Jun'17 0 0
Total 9484553 1361987
2015-16 107660 15610
201

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top