CUSTOMS EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
R Ramdadass Contractor – Appellant
Versus
Rangareddy - G S T – Respondent
ST/27101/2013
##PAGE1##
1 Appeal No. ST/27101/2013
CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
HYDERABAD
REGIONAL BENCH - COURT NO. – I
Service Tax Appeal No. 27101 of 2013
(Arising out of Order-in-Original No.18/2013-Adjn (Commr) S.T. dated 25.03.2013 passed
by Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax, Hyderabad)
R. Ramadass, Contractor .. APPELLANT
H.No.2-132/4,
Engineer’s Enclave,
Chandanagar,
Hyderabad,
Telangana – 500 050.
VERSUS
Pr. Commissioner of Central Tax .. RESPONDENT
Rangareddy - GST
GST Bhavan,
H.No. 1-98-7-43,
VIP Hills,
Jaihind Enclave,
Madhapur
Hyderabad,
Telangana – 500 081.
APPEARANCE:
Shri S. Nageswara Rao, Consultant for the Appellant.
Shri A. Rangadham, Authorized Representative for the Respondent.
CORAM: HON’BLE Mr. A.K. JYOTISHI, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
HON’BLE Mr. ANGAD PRASAD, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
FINAL ORDER No. A/30253/2026
Date of Hearing: 27.01.2026
Date of Decision: 27.04.2026
[ORDER PER: ANGAD PRASAD]
The appellant has filed this appeal against the Order-in-Original No.
18/2013-Adjn (Commr) S.T. dated 25.03.2013 (impugned order), whereby,
Learned Commissioner has confirmed the demand of Rs. 1,08,75,965/- (for
period October 2006 to June 2011) and Rs. 3,71,101/- (for period July 2011
to December 2011) along with interest and penalties under Section 76, 77
and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994.
##PAGE2##2 Appeal No. ST/27101/2013
2. The fact, in brief is, that the appellant is engaged in execution of
various works contracts for entities such as Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd.,
(BHEL) under different agreements.
3. The Department classified the activities under taken by the appellant
under “Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency Services” (MRAS). The case
of the Department is that the appellant was supplying manpower, whereas,
the appellant contends that the contracts were lump sum / job work
contracts and not manpower supply.
4. Learned Counsel for the appellant submitted that agreements are work
contract / job contract basis, not manpower supply basis, payment are based
lump sum, linked to work out paid, not depends on number of workers.
5. Learned Counsel for the appellant submitted that no any obligation
exists to provide manpower to BHEL. It is also submitted that control and
supervision remained with the appellant.
6. It is further submitted that mere deployment of labour does not
convert the activities into “Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency
Services” (MRAS). Learned Counsel for the appellant further, submitted that
there is no suppression of facts or intent to evade Service Tax. The appellant
has acted under bonofide belief. Therefore, invocation of extended period is
not sustainable as per law.
7. Learned Authorized Representative (AR) submitted that reiterates the
findings given by the Learned Commissioner and further submitted that the
nature of activity involves manpower deployment, payments include labour
components, non-registration and non-filing of returns justify invocation of
extended period.
##PAGE3##3 Appeal No. ST/27101/2013
8. Heard both the sides and perused the records.
9. The issue is, whether the activities under taken by the appellant fall
under “Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency Services” (MRAS) or
otherwise.
10. ‘Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency Services’ (MRAS) has been
defined under Section 65 (68) of the Finance Act as follows:
“(68) “manpower recruitment or supply agency” means any person engaged
in providing any service, directly or indirectly, in any manner for
recruitment or supply of manpower, temporarily or otherwise, to any other
person;”
11. Learned Commissioner has summarizes agreements between appellant
and BHEL as follows which is relevant for determination of the issue:
“18. Sri.R. Ramadass has not disputed the fact that he has received certain
amounts from M/s. BHEL during the impugned period for provision of
services; that in anticipation of orders from M/s BHEL, he has obtained
service tax registration under ‘MRAS’; that service tax collected from M/s
BHEL during the period from July, 2011 to Dec, 2011 has been credited to
the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.