SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CESTAT) 1756

CUSTOMS EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
RAM CONSTRUCTION CO – Appellant
Versus
CGST LUCKNOW – Respondent


CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ALLAHABAD REGIONAL BENCH - COURT NO. I (Arising out of Order-in-Appeal No. 309-ST-APPL-LKO-2023, dated - 25.04.2023 passed by Commissioner (Appeals) CGST & Central Excise, Lucknow)

M/s Ram Construction Co …..Appellant (Prop Shri Arvind Kumar Singh Yadav, 4/21, Sulabh Awas, Sector-4, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226010)

VERSUS Commissioner, CGST & Central, Lucknow ….Respondent (7-A Ashok Marg GST Bhawan, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226001)

APPEARANCE Shri A. P. Mathur, Advocate for the Appellant Shri Santosh Kumar, Authorized Representative for the Respondent CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. P.K. CHOUDHARY, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

HON’BLE MR. RAJEEV TANDON, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)

FINAL ORDER NO.-70122/2026 DATE OF HEARING : 27.04.2026 DATE OF DECISION : 27.04.2026 P. K. CHOUDHARY:

Heard both the sides and perused the appeal records.

2. We find that the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has not decided the appeal on merits but rejected the same on limitation on the ground that the appeal filed by the Appellant before him was delayed beyond the condonable period.

3. It is the case of the Appellant-Assessee that the Order-In- Original dated 09.05.2018, dispatched by the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top