SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CESTAT) 1957

CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

BANGALORE

REGIONAL BENCH - COURT NO. 1


Service Tax Appeal No. 27312 of 2013


Nagarjuna Ayurvedic Centre Ltd.

Thannipuzha, Kalady,

Ernakulam,

Kerala – 683 550.

Appellant(s)


VERSUS


Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax

C.R. Buildings,

Queen’s Road,

Cochin – 18.

Respondent(s)


With


(i). Service Tax Appeal No. 27661 of 2013

(Nagarjuna Ayurvedic Centre Ltd.)


(ii). Service Tax Appeal No. 20325 of 2024

(Nagarjuna Ayurvedic Centre Ltd.)


(iii). Service Tax Appeal No. 20326 of 2024

(Nagarjuna Ayurvedic Centre Ltd.)


(iv). Service Tax Appeal No. 20327 of 2024

(Nagarjuna Ayurvedic Centre Ltd.)


(v). Service Tax Appeal No. 20328 of 2024

(Nagarjuna Ayurvedic Centre Ltd.)


(vi). Service Tax Appeal No. 20329 of 2024

(Nagarjuna Ayurvedic Centre Ltd.)


(vii). Service Tax Appeal No. 20330 of 2024

(Nagarjuna Ayurvedic Centre Ltd.)


(viii). Service Tax Appeal No. 20331 of 2024

(Nagarjuna Ayurvedic Centre Ltd.)


(ix). Service Tax No. 20332 of 2024

(Nagarjuna Ayurvedic Centre Ltd.)


APPEARANCE:

Mr. Kurian Thomas, Advocate for the Appellant

Mr. M.A. Jithendra, Assistant Commissioner (AR) for the Respondent


CORAM: HON'BLE DR. D.M. MISRA, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

HON'BLE MRS R BHAGYA DEVI, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)


Final Order No. 20656 - 20665 / 2026


DATE OF HEARING: 27.01.2026

DATE OF DECISION: 30.04.2026

PER : DR. D.M. MISRA

These appeals are filed against respective Order-in Original/Order-in-Appeal passed by the Principal Commissioner of Central Excise/Commissioner of Central Excise (A), Cochin. Since involve common issues are taken up together for hearing and disposal. The details of the appeals are detailed as below:

Sl. No. Appeal No. OIA/OiO No. SCN No & Date Period Tax (Rs)
1 ST/27312/2013 OIA 03-04/2013 dated 29.04.2013 SCN No.16/2008/ST dt. 05.03.2008

SCN No. 36/2008/ST dt. 21.04.2008

SCN No. 87/2002/ST dt. 12.08.2008

01.10.2002 to 31.03.2007

April 2007 to September 2007

October 2007 to June 2008

38,04,382/-

6,85,218/-

12,12,718/-

2 ST/27661/2013 OIA 03-04/2013 dated 29.04.2013 SCN No. 36/2008/ST dt. 21.04.2008 01.07.2008 to 31.03.2009 9,41,787/-
3 ST/20325/2024 OIO No. 42-49/2021-22/ST/COMMR dated 30.03.2022 SCN No. 10/2010/ST dt. 09.02.2010 April 2009 to September 2009 6,74,688/-
4 ST/20329/2024 OIO No. 42-49/2021-22/ST/COMMR dated 30.03.2022 SCN No. 221/2010/ST dt. 02.12.2010 October 2009 to March 2010 9,20,176/-
5 ST/20331/2024 OIO No. 42-49/2021-22/ST/COMMR dated 30.03.2022 SCN No. 114/2011/ST dt. 24.08.2011 April 2010 to March 2011 22,34,351/-
6 ST/20327/2024 OIO No. 42-49/2021-22/ST/COMMR dated 30.03.2022 SCN No. 130/2012/ST dt. 09.10.2012 April 2011 to March 2012 23,21,686/-
7 ST/20332/2024 OIO No. 42-49/2021-22/ST/COMMR dated 30.03.2022 SCN No.178/2013/ST dt. 10.10.2013 April 2012 to March 2013 34,20,654/-
8 ST/20326/2024 OIO No. 42-49/2021-22/ST/COMMR dated 30.03.2022 SCN No.100/2015/ST dt. 20.04.2015 April 2013 to March 2014 50,88,651/-
9 ST/20330/2024 OIO No. 42-49/2021-22/ST/COMMR dated 30.03.2022 SCN No. 414/2015/ST dt. 03.11.2015 April 2014 to June 2015 85,32,500/-
10 ST/20328/2024 OIO No. 42-49/2021-22/ST/COMMR dated 30.03.2022 SCN No. 36/2018/ST dt. 07.04.2018 July 2015 to June 2017 2,27,26,950/-

2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the appellant during the relevant period has been running a Ayurvedic Medical Centre. Alleging that they were providing various ayurvedic therapies, treatment, etc., such as sauna and steam bath, Turkish bath, solarium, spas, reducing or slimming saloons, gymnasium, yoga, meditation, massage (excluding therapeutic massage) or any other like services fall under the taxable category of ‘Health and Fitness Service’; show-cause notice was issued to them on 05.03.2008 demanding service tax for the period 01.10.2002 to 31.02.2007 along with interest and penalty. Thereafter, periodical show-cause notices were issued to the appellant alleging that the activities provided by them being taxable under the category of ‘Health and Fitness Service’, hence, required to discharge service tax on the same. For the period post 01.07.2012 also, show-cause notices were issued to the appellant alleging that the activities of the appellant are classifiable under the scope of ‘Service’ as per Section 65B(44) read with Section 66B of the Act and since the said service neither included in the Negative List mentioned under Section 66D of the Finance Act, 1994 nor exempted under Notification No.25/2012-ST dated 20.06.2012, service tax was demanded for the period from 01.07.2012 to 30.06.2017 along with interest and penalties. On adjudication, the demands were confirmed with interest and penalties. Wherever the orders are passed by the Additional Commissioner/Assistant Commissioner, appeals were filed before the learned Commissioner (A), who in turn rejected their appeals. Hence, the present appeals are against the respective orders.

3. At the outset, the learned advocate for the appellant has submitted that appellant is engaged in the activity of providing healthcare services popularly known as Nagarjuna Ayurveda Hospital. They undertake specialized treatment for various ailments and treatments which are carried out by qualified Medical Professionals and Therapists under the Ayurvedic System of Medicine. The learned advocate has submitted that before the authorities belo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top