CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
BANGALORE
REGIONAL BENCH - COURT NO. 1
Service Tax Appeal No. 27312 of 2013
Nagarjuna Ayurvedic Centre Ltd.
Thannipuzha, Kalady,
Ernakulam,
Kerala – 683 550.
Appellant(s)
VERSUS
Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax
C.R. Buildings,
Queen’s Road,
Cochin – 18.
Respondent(s)
With
(i). Service Tax Appeal No. 27661 of 2013
(Nagarjuna Ayurvedic Centre Ltd.)
(ii). Service Tax Appeal No. 20325 of 2024
(Nagarjuna Ayurvedic Centre Ltd.)
(iii). Service Tax Appeal No. 20326 of 2024
(Nagarjuna Ayurvedic Centre Ltd.)
(iv). Service Tax Appeal No. 20327 of 2024
(Nagarjuna Ayurvedic Centre Ltd.)
(v). Service Tax Appeal No. 20328 of 2024
(Nagarjuna Ayurvedic Centre Ltd.)
(vi). Service Tax Appeal No. 20329 of 2024
(Nagarjuna Ayurvedic Centre Ltd.)
(vii). Service Tax Appeal No. 20330 of 2024
(Nagarjuna Ayurvedic Centre Ltd.)
(viii). Service Tax Appeal No. 20331 of 2024
(Nagarjuna Ayurvedic Centre Ltd.)
(ix). Service Tax No. 20332 of 2024
(Nagarjuna Ayurvedic Centre Ltd.)
APPEARANCE:
Mr. Kurian Thomas, Advocate for the Appellant
Mr. M.A. Jithendra, Assistant Commissioner (AR) for the Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE DR. D.M. MISRA, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
HON'BLE MRS R BHAGYA DEVI, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
Final Order No. 20656 - 20665 / 2026
DATE OF HEARING: 27.01.2026
DATE OF DECISION: 30.04.2026
PER : DR. D.M. MISRA
These appeals are filed against respective Order-in Original/Order-in-Appeal passed by the Principal Commissioner of Central Excise/Commissioner of Central Excise (A), Cochin. Since involve common issues are taken up together for hearing and disposal. The details of the appeals are detailed as below:
| Sl. No. | Appeal No. | OIA/OiO No. | SCN No & Date | Period | Tax (Rs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ST/27312/2013 | OIA 03-04/2013 dated 29.04.2013 | SCN No.16/2008/ST dt. 05.03.2008 SCN No. 36/2008/ST dt. 21.04.2008 SCN No. 87/2002/ST dt. 12.08.2008 |
01.10.2002 to 31.03.2007 April 2007 to September 2007 October 2007 to June 2008 |
38,04,382/- 6,85,218/- 12,12,718/- |
| 2 | ST/27661/2013 | OIA 03-04/2013 dated 29.04.2013 | SCN No. 36/2008/ST dt. 21.04.2008 | 01.07.2008 to 31.03.2009 | 9,41,787/- |
| 3 | ST/20325/2024 | OIO No. 42-49/2021-22/ST/COMMR dated 30.03.2022 | SCN No. 10/2010/ST dt. 09.02.2010 | April 2009 to September 2009 | 6,74,688/- |
| 4 | ST/20329/2024 | OIO No. 42-49/2021-22/ST/COMMR dated 30.03.2022 | SCN No. 221/2010/ST dt. 02.12.2010 | October 2009 to March 2010 | 9,20,176/- |
| 5 | ST/20331/2024 | OIO No. 42-49/2021-22/ST/COMMR dated 30.03.2022 | SCN No. 114/2011/ST dt. 24.08.2011 | April 2010 to March 2011 | 22,34,351/- |
| 6 | ST/20327/2024 | OIO No. 42-49/2021-22/ST/COMMR dated 30.03.2022 | SCN No. 130/2012/ST dt. 09.10.2012 | April 2011 to March 2012 | 23,21,686/- |
| 7 | ST/20332/2024 | OIO No. 42-49/2021-22/ST/COMMR dated 30.03.2022 | SCN No.178/2013/ST dt. 10.10.2013 | April 2012 to March 2013 | 34,20,654/- |
| 8 | ST/20326/2024 | OIO No. 42-49/2021-22/ST/COMMR dated 30.03.2022 | SCN No.100/2015/ST dt. 20.04.2015 | April 2013 to March 2014 | 50,88,651/- |
| 9 | ST/20330/2024 | OIO No. 42-49/2021-22/ST/COMMR dated 30.03.2022 | SCN No. 414/2015/ST dt. 03.11.2015 | April 2014 to June 2015 | 85,32,500/- |
| 10 | ST/20328/2024 | OIO No. 42-49/2021-22/ST/COMMR dated 30.03.2022 | SCN No. 36/2018/ST dt. 07.04.2018 | July 2015 to June 2017 | 2,27,26,950/- |
2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the appellant during the relevant period has been running a Ayurvedic Medical Centre. Alleging that they were providing various ayurvedic therapies, treatment, etc., such as sauna and steam bath, Turkish bath, solarium, spas, reducing or slimming saloons, gymnasium, yoga, meditation, massage (excluding therapeutic massage) or any other like services fall under the taxable category of ‘Health and Fitness Service’; show-cause notice was issued to them on 05.03.2008 demanding service tax for the period 01.10.2002 to 31.02.2007 along with interest and penalty. Thereafter, periodical show-cause notices were issued to the appellant alleging that the activities provided by them being taxable under the category of ‘Health and Fitness Service’, hence, required to discharge service tax on the same. For the period post 01.07.2012 also, show-cause notices were issued to the appellant alleging that the activities of the appellant are classifiable under the scope of ‘Service’ as per Section 65B(44) read with Section 66B of the Act and since the said service neither included in the Negative List mentioned under Section 66D of the Finance Act, 1994 nor exempted under Notification No.25/2012-ST dated 20.06.2012, service tax was demanded for the period from 01.07.2012 to 30.06.2017 along with interest and penalties. On adjudication, the demands were confirmed with interest and penalties. Wherever the orders are passed by the Additional Commissioner/Assistant Commissioner, appeals were filed before the learned Commissioner (A), who in turn rejected their appeals. Hence, the present appeals are against the respective orders.
3. At the outset, the learned advocate for the appellant has submitted that appellant is engaged in the activity of providing healthcare services popularly known as Nagarjuna Ayurveda Hospital. They undertake specialized treatment for various ailments and treatments which are carried out by qualified Medical Professionals and Therapists under the Ayurvedic System of Medicine. The learned advocate has submitted that before the authorities belo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.