SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CESTAT) 2087

CUSTOMS EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Amit K Dedhia – Appellant
Versus
TUTICORIN – Respondent


Per Mr. VASA SESHAGIRI RAO

The present appeal has been filed by the Appellant, M/s. Amit K. Dedhia, against Order-in-Original No. 17/2016 dated 26.08.2016 passed by the Commissioner of Customs, Tuticorin (hereinafter referred to as the Impugned Order), whereby the Customs Broker license of the Appellant was revoked, the security deposit forfeited and penalty imposed under the provisions of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013.

1.2 The facts of the case, as borne out from the records including the Statement of Facts, reveal that the Appellant is a licensed Customs Broker holding License No. TRY-43/2002 and had initially engaged a qualified Regulation 9 holder, Smt. K.S. Parvathi. Upon her resignation on 28.05.2011, the Appellant claims to have appointed Shri Antony Raj and intimated the same to the Department vide letter dated 12.07.2011. It is the case of the Department, as reflected in the Show Cause Notice and Inquiry Report, that after resignation of the authorized signatory, the Appellant continued to transact business without a qualified person under Regulation 9 of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984 or Regulation 8 of the Customs House Agents Licensin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top