SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CHH) 3674

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal, J
ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SMT. RUKHMANI NAYAK – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Raja Sharma, Advocate

Order On Board

17 .04.2025

1. This Revision has been preferred challenging the order dated 14.01.2025 passed by 4th Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Raipur (C.G.) in Claim Case No.614/2023, whereby, the application preferred by the applicant/Insurance Company under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC with regard to delay, has been dismissed.

2. In this case, a claim application was filed before the Tribunal by respondent No.1 claiming compensation. The said application was filed beyond the period of six months. Therefore, the applicant/Insurance Company filed an application under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC which was rejected by the Tribunal vide impugned order dated 14.01.2025 against which the present revision has been filed.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant/insurance company submits that as per Section 166 (3) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 , there is a limitation of six months for preferring a claim application and there is no provision for condonation of delay or extension of time for filing the Claim application. However, the Tribunal has proceeded with the matter ignoring the delay caused in filing the claim application, therefore, the claim application itself is not maintainab

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top