HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
RAHUL JHA, J
HITESH KUMAR SAHU – Appellant
Versus
COAL INDIA LIMITED – Respondent
Certainly! Please provide the legal document content you'd like me to analyze, and I will generate the key points with appropriate references as specified.
CAV ORDER
1. Challenge in the instant Writ Petition is to the orders dated 15/05/2021 & 03/09/2021 (Annexure-P/1) passed by the Respondents, whereby, the Authority concerned without adhering to the statutory scheme for
2. (a) Case of the petitioner, in brief, is that the Petitioner is a differently abled person suffering from locomotor disability. A certificate in this regard has been issued by the appropriate authority. The Petitioner was initially appointed as Management Trainee (Finance) in the Respondent Department on 03/10/2015. After successful completion of the training period, he has been designated as Assistant Manager (F) on 15/05/2017.
(b) The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents’ authorities while promoting Assistant Manager (F) in E-3 Grade, E-3 to the post of Deputy Manager (F) in E-4 Grade, E-4, did not follow the mandatory provision of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 , The Act, 2016, and left out the case of the petitioner by not promoting him on the post of Deputy Registrar (F) in E-4 Grade.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.