SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CHH) 13050

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
SHANKAR LAL DAYALANI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent


Order on Board

Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice

0 5 .12 .202 4

1. Heard Mr. Surfaraj Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Y.S. Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General, appearing for the State/respondent Nos. 1 to 6 & 16, Mr. A.S. Kachhawaha, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No. 7 / Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur and Mr. Manoj Paranjpe along with Mr. Siddharsh Tiwari, learned counsel, appearing for respondent Nos. 8 to 15.

2. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner styled as ‘Public Interest Litigation’

with the following prayers:

10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to matter from the concerned respondent authorities.

10.2. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue suitable writ(s), order (s), direction (s) by directing the respondent authorities, particularly, Respondents No.4, 5, 7 and 16 to decide the application (Annexure P-1) with time frame.

10.3. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief(s), which is deemed fit and proper in the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case.”

3. Mr. Surfaraj

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top