SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CHH) 904

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal, J
MANOJ KUSHWAHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Neeraj Mehta, Advocate; Mr. Arvind Dubey, G.A.

Judgment on Board

24/03/2025

1. The present appeal arises out of the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 22.09.2007 passed by learned Second Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Ramanujganj, District-Sarguja (C.G.), in Session Trial No. 111/2005 whereby the learned Judge has convicted and sentenced the appellants as under:

ConvictionSentence & Fine
U/s 307/34 of IPC (to cause injury to Indrajeet)R.I. for 7 years and fine of Rs.500/-, in default of payment of fine amount additional R.I. for two months.
U/s 323/34 of IPC (to cause injury to Mahavir)Fine of Rs. 500/-, in default of payment of fine amount additional R.I. for two months.
U/s 323/34 of IPC (to cause injury to Ramlal)Fine of Rs. 500/-, in default of payment of fine amount additional R.I. for two months.

2. The prosecution story, in brief, is that on the date of the incident i.e. 03.08.2004 at about 7:00 am, complainant Mahabir (PW-3) along with his brothers namely Inrajeet (PW-5) and Ramlal (PW-4) working in the field, that time, both the appellants armed with clubs came to the field called bad and vulgar names and further prevented them from ploughing the filed to which they claimed to be their own land. Af

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top