SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(CHH) 5448

PRINCIPAL BENCH CHHATTISGARH
UJAL KUNWAR and ORS. – Appellant
Versus
GANESH RAMand ORS. – Respondent


CAV Judgment

Heard on I.A. N. 06/2023, an application under Section 100(5) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for framing of additional substantial question of law.

2. Ms. Sameeksha Gupta, Advocate submits that she does not want to press this application. The same is dismissed as not pressed.

3. Appeal is heard finally.

4. This appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is arising out of the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2010 in Civil Appeal No. 07-A/2009 passed by the learned Additional District Judge Sarangarh, District Raigarh (CG) arising out of the judgment and decree dated 31.03.2009 in Civil Suit No. 124-A/2006 passed by the learned Civil Judge Class-II, Sarangarh, District Raigarh. The appeal was admitted by this Court on 14.01.2021 on the following substantial question of law:

“Whether the first Appellate Court is justified in holding that the plaintiff has proved the execution and attestation of the will executed on 23.05.2000 by Parkhit in favour of the plaintiff under Section 63(c) of Indian Succession Act, 1925 read with Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, by recording a finding which is perverse to the record?”

5. The parties shall be referr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top