Back
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Rakesh Mohan Pandey, J
Sunil Kumar Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India Through Enforcement Directorate – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. anticipatory bail sought by applicants in economic offence. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding false implication and previously granted bail in similar cases. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. opposition from the respondent outlining the nature of the economic offence. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. analysis of investigation status and previous bail context. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. discussion on compliance with section 45 of pmla for granting bail. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. final conclusion allowing bail with conditions. (Para 13 , 14) |
Order on Board
16.01.2025
1. The applicants have preferred this first anticipatory bail application under Section 4 82 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 , apprehending their arrest in connection with Special Criminal Case No.04/2023 pending before the Special Judge, (Prevention of Money-Laundering Act/IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Raipur, in relation to Crime No.ECIR/01/NGR/2011 dated 10.01.2011 renumbered as ECIR/RPSZO/05/2013 and its subsequent addendum dated 10.02.2020, registered by Enforcement Directorate, Sub-Zonal Office-Nagpur for the commission of an offence punishable under Sections 3 & 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (for short ‘the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
