SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CHH) 12862

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
GHANSHYAM – Appellant
Versus
VENKATESHWAR PRASAD CHANDRAKAR – Respondent


Order on Board

Per Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge

09.12.2024

1. This appeal under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 challenging the judgment and decree dated 20.02.2024 passed by 8th Additional District Judge, Durg (C.G.) in Civil Suit No. 50-A/2018 (Smt. Punabai Vs. Venkateshwar Prasad Chandrakar and Others).

2. The first appeal has been filed on 26.04.2024, which was registered as F.A. No. 97/2024. When the matter listed on 20.06.2024, this Court has observed that since the application has been moved for exemption from Court fee and it is stated that already the appellant was allowed to sue as a pauper. To verify the facts, record of the learned trial Court was summoned.

3. After filing of the appeal, the appellants also moved an application under Order 33 of CPC with a prayer that the appellant be permitted to sue as an indigent person, consequently exempting to afÏx court fee on the valuation of this appeal.

4. It is not in dispute that the appeal has been filed by the appellant without payment of any court fee as required under the law and the appeal has been registered as a regular first appeal bearing no. 97/2024. Subsequent to filing of the appeal an application I.A. No. 02/2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top