Back
2025 Supreme(Online)(CHH) 2028
2025:CGHC:7015 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 57 of 2022
1 - Rajesh Kumar Sao S/o Kapurchand Sao Aged About 32 Years R/o Gram Bhanthori, Post Saldih, Tahsil Basna, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.
2 - Smt. Tanju Sao W/o Rajesh Kumar Sao Aged About 30 Years R/o Gram Bhanthori, Post Saldih, Tahsil Basna, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home, Atal Nagar, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur District Raipur, Digitally signed by 2 - Collector, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.
SHOAIB SHOAIB ANWAR ANWAR Date:
2025.02.07
22:27:32 +0530
3 - The Superintendent Of Police District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Station House OfÏcer, Police Station Basna, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.
5 - Chhattisgarh State Sahu Sangh, Through Its Secretary/ Sanyoujak, OfÏce At Shri Bhamashah Hostel, Sahu Complex, Tikarpara Raipur
6 - The Secretary, District Sahu Sangh, Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. 7 - The Secretary, Tahsil Sahu Sangh Pithora, District Manasamund 8 - The President, Regional Sahu Sangh, Gram Bagaardarha, Post Parsaavni, Thana Saankra, Tahsil Basna, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.
9 - The President, Gramin Sahu Samaj, Gram Barikpali, Post Saldih, Tahsil Basna, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s)
(Cause title taken from CIS)
For Petitioner(s) : Shri Parag Kotecha, Advocate.
For Respondent/State : Ms. Upasana Mehta, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge
Order on Board
07.02.2025
1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction towards the respondent authority to take appropriate steps and measures against the respondent society i.e. respondent Nos. 6 to 9. As the petitioner is subjected to social boycott by respondent no. 6 to 9, in spite of an order in favour of the petitioner by the respondent no. 5/Chhattisgarh State Sahu Sangh. The petitioner has requested the State authority/respondent Nos. 1 to 4 on various occasion intimating about the social boycott made by the respondent no. 6 to 9, however, authorities are not taking any action on the complaint and request made by the petitioner and the petitioner is still subjected to the social boycott by the respondent Sangh i.e. respondents No. 6 to 9.
2. Learned State counsel would submit by referring paragraph 7 of the reply filed by the State that on receipt of the complaint inquiry has been made and as per the report, it is found that the petitioners have not been boycotted from their Samaj nor the ofÏce bearer of the society are having any objection in their social acceptance.
3. I have heard the parties and perused the evidence adduced by the petitioner no. 2, which is annexed by the State in its reply at page no. 24. Who has specifically stated that she is subjected to social boycott by the Society since 2011, hence, it appears that even presently the petitioners are facing the problem of social boycott by society/respondent Nos. 6 to 9. Hence the District Collector Mahasammund is directed to look into the grievance of the petitioners and settle the dispute and the grievance lodged by the petitioner nos 1 and 2, by providing sufÏcient opportunity of hearing to the respondent nos. 6, 7, 8 & 9 also within a period of 50 days from today.
4. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of.
