HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Narendra Kumar Vyas, J
Tulshi Steel Traders Propritor – Appellant
Versus
Purva Construction Propritor - Mitrabhan Sahu – Respondent
1. Since common question of law and facts involved in both the cases are one and the same, therefore, they are heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common order.
2. The brief facts of the case are as under:-a. The details of the case number of the trial Court, cheque number, amount, date of dishonor, date of returning memo, and date of issuance of notice to the accused by the complainant are given in the tabular form as under:-
| Complaint Case No. and ACQA No. | Cheque No. | Amount (in Rs.) | Date of Dishonor of Cheque | Date of Receipt of Returning Memo by the complainant | Date of issuance of notice |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complaint Case No. 2242/2017 & ACQA No. 425/2024 | 000275 | 67,640/- | 18.05.2017 | 18.05.2017 | 07.06.2017 |
| Complaint Case No. 2243/2017 & ACQA No. 194/2024 | 000269 | 1,70,600/- | 08.05.2017 | 08.05.2017 | 07.06.2017 |
b. As per details mentioned above the complainant has filed complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (in short “N.I. Act, 1881”) mainly contending that the complainant is doing the business of cement, bricks and supply of construction materials. Due to relationship with the complainant, the accused has taken material for the amount of Rs. 67,470/- and 1,70,600/-and to di
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.