SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CHH) 3216

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
HANSRAJ PESHWANI – Appellant
Versus
SMT. RASHMI SAO – Respondent


Order on Board

06 .01.2025

1. The petitioners have challenged the order passed by the learned IInd Additional District Judge, Bilaspur in Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No. 10/2022 dated 16.10.2024, whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioners was dismissed that was preferred to restore MJC No. 6/2017 which was dismissed by the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Takhatpur, vide order dated 02.11.2021.

2. The facts of the present case are that respondent No. 1/plaintiff filed a Civil Suit for declaration of the title and permanent injunction over survey No. 448/4, new survey numbers 448/31 admeasuring 0.03 acre and survey No. 448/32 admeasuring 0.09 acre, total admeasuring 0.12 acre situated at Ameri, District Bilaspur. The petitioners who were defendants in that Civil suit, filed a written statement as well as counterclaim on 05.12.2008. Thereafter, the petitioners never participated in the Civil Suit and the same was ex-parte decreed in favour of the plaintiff vide judgment and decree dated 14.02.2017. The petitioners preferred an application under Order 9 Rule 13 of CPC for setting-aside ex-parte decree on 22.06.2017 and the same was dismissed for want of prosecution on 15.11.2017

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top