SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CHH) 3069

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
BHARTI @ PUSHPANJALI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent


Order on Board

09/01/2025

1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is questioning the order dated 18/11/2024 by which the Additional Collector, District Mungeli has vacated the stay order dated 20/02/2024 (Annexure P/2) passed by the SDO (Revenue), Pathariya, District Mungeli in Revenue Case No.202402250500009/A-6-A/2023-24.

2. Being aggrieved by the order dated 17/01/2024 passed by the Naib Tahsildar, Pathariya in a revenue proceeding, the petitioner has preferred an appeal under Section 44(1) read with Section 52 of CGLRC before the SDO in which after hearing the parties, the SDO has passed an order by exercising power under Section 2 of the CGLRC directing that no sale and purchase of the land in question during pendency of the appeal. Against the said interim order, the respondent preferred a revision under Section 50 of the CGLRC before the Additional Collector stating that, there can be no stay of execution of the order beyond the period prescribed under Section 52 of the CGLRC i.e. “till the next date of hearing or one month whichever is earlier”. There is a provision in Section 52 that the execution of the order can only be stayed till the next date of hearing or one m

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top