SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CHH) 100

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Shri Deepak Kumar Tiwari, J
DHURANDHAR BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS – Appellant
Versus
RAVISH SOOD – Respondent


Advocates:
Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate.

Order On Board

1. This petition has been filed against the order dated 31st July, 2024 whereby the application preferred by the petitioner/plaintiff under Order

16 Rule 1 (2) read with Section 151 of the CPC was dismissed.

2. Facts of the case are that the petitioner/plaintiff has filed a civil suit for declaration and possession. In the said suit, during the course of plaintiff’s evidence, the subject application has been filed wherein the defendants/respondents have raised an objection, as the petitioner/ plaintiff is desirous to prove the certified copy of the sale deed and the lay out of the society for which permission has been granted by the Municipal Corporation, Raipur to respondent No.2/Society, and the said document has already been exhibited and the same can be read in evidence. The trial Court only on the ground that the petitioner/plaintiff has not mentioned the names of witnesses in the list filed earlier, has rejected the subject application, which is not proper. Hence this petition.

3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the defendants have put forth the submission that the said document has already been marked. He fairly submits that wh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top