Back
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Sanjay K. Agrawal, Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal, JJ
VIJAN MANDAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal, J.
1. Since these three criminal appeals, under Section 374(2) of CrPC, have arisen out of the same impugned judgment and the question of law and facts also being similar in these appeals, they have been clubbed together, heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.
2. In these criminal appeals, the judgment dated 07/11/2019 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Kondagaon, District Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh, in POCSO Case No.08/2019 has been challenged by which the three Appellants herein have been convicted and sentenced as under:
Appellants Conviction Sentence
| Ramsing Salam | u/s 493 of IPC | RI for 7 years with fine of Rs.10,000, in default of payment of fine, additional RI for 1 year. |
| u/s 6 of POCSO Act | RI for 20 years with fine of Rs.50,000, in default of payment of fine, additional RI for 1 year. | |
| Vijan Mandal | u/s 312 of IPC | RI for 3 years with fine of Rs.10,000, in default of payment of fine, additional RI for 1 year. |
| u/s 313 of IPC | RI for 10 years with fine of Rs.50,000, in default of payment of fine, additional RI for 1 year. | |
| u/s 5(2)(3)(4) of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 | RI for 5, 5, 5 years | |
| Mankumari Yadav | u/s 201 of IPC |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
