SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CHH) 10837

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
DAYAMANI DANIEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent


Order on Board

(22/10/2024)

Following reliefs have been prayed for by the petitioner in this petition:-

“10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent No. 3 for registration of sale deed in favour of petitioner, in accordance with law, within stipulated time.

10.2 To kindly grant any other relief which may be deem fit in the given facts and circumstances of the instant case.”

2. This petition is against the illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory action on the part of the respondent authorities, particularly inaction on the part of respondent No.3 who has not registered the sale deed in respect of land bearing Khasra No. 421 and 422 total area admeasuring 1.26 acres (0.5100 hectare) situated at Village Bhathri, PH No. No. 37 RIC Jarhagaon, Tahsil and District Mungeli, CG without any reason. The said property was the self acquired property of late Anjana – the mother of respondents No. 4 and 5. Said Anjana was belonging Christian religion by faith, originally the scheduled caste category, but later she married one Samual Ekka, who belongs to scheduled tribe. Subsequently, on her death, the aforesaid lands have been mutated in the name of respondents No. 4 and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top