SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CHH) 3950

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
VIJAY PRAKASH RAY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
MCRC/2861/2025



2025:CGHC:16920 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Digitally signed by GOURI GOURI MUDALIAR MUDALIAR Date:

2025.04.17 MCRC No. 2861 of 2025

11:21:52 +0530 Vijay Prakash Ray S/o Ramvriksh Ray Aged About 53 Years R/o Shanti Nagar, State 5B, House No. 526, Supela Bhilai, (Wrongly Mentioned As Bilai)

District Durg Chhattisgarh ... Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Hathband, District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh ... Respondent For applicant : Shri Jitendra Gupta, Advocate.

For : Shri Sakib Ahmed, PL.

Respondent/State Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice

Order on Board

11/04/2025

1. Proceeding of this matter have been taken through video conferencing.

2. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 193/2024 registered at Police Station Hathband, District Baloda Bazar-

Bhatapara (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 34(2), 59(A)

and 36 of Excise Act and Section 111 of Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita.

3. Case of the prosecution is that on the date of incident i.e. on 13/10/2024 the police has received information regarding illegal illicit liquor upon which the police raided the place Yadu Farm House Kedar Badi Kesda where after preparing the panchnama, seized 532 Box of liquor from the possession of three co-accused persons namely Laxminath Yadu, Sarju Yadu and Baratu Yadav. Further the above named accused persons were arrested on 14/10/2024. Further the memorandum has been recorded and the accused persons has disclosed the fact that along with other absconded persons namely Sanjay Dhritlahre and Gopi Dhritlahre and other accused persons they were involved in the alleged offence and used to sale the alleged non duty liquor of Madhya Pradesh after making of Chhattisgarh. On 06/12/2024 co-accused Gopi Dhritlahre was arrested and upon his memorandum name of other accused person have been disclosed and they have also been arrested. Further during investigation Sonu Chature and Dilip Lahre was arrested and memorandum statement has been recorded. The present applicant has been arrested on the basis of the memorandum statement of the accused persons and certain articles like empty bottle, bottle cap, sticker etc have been seized.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case and 532 box of liquor was not seized from the exclusive possession of the applicant. He further submits that under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act, minimum punishment is one year and maximum punishment is three years. He also submits that the applicant has two criminal antecedents at Crime No.529/2001 (Excise Act) and Crime No. 446/2007 (Sec. 294, 506(B), 323,341 of IPC) Police station Supela, District: Durg in which the applicant has been acquitted. He would submit that co-accused person namely Gopi @ Sonu Dhritlahare has been granted regular bail by this Court in MCRC No.1865/2025 vide order dated 22/03/2025, the applicant is in jail since 16/02/2025 and the conclusion of the trial is likely to take quite long time.

Therefore, he prays for grant of regular bail to the applicant.

5. Learned counsel for the State/non-applicant would oppose the bail application and submit that the charge-sheet has been filed in the present case before the competent Court.

6. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary.

7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, nature and gravity of allegation levelled against the applicant and the fact that the applicant has two criminal antecedents at Crime No.529/2001 (Excise Act) and Crime No. 446/2007 (Sec. 294, 506(B), 323,341 of IPC) Police station Supela, District: Durg in which the applicant has been acquitted, also considering the fact that co-accused person namely Gopi @ Sonu Dhritlahare ha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top