Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Sanjay K. Agrawal, Radhakishan Agrawal, JJ
Siyaram @ Prem @ Lamsena – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
[C A V Judgment]
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.
1. The present Criminal Appeal, filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘CrPC’) assails the legality, validity and correctness of the Judgment dated 4.7.2014 passed by learned Second Additional Sessions Judge, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon in Sessions Case No.84/2011, by which each of the two appellants herein i.e. Siyaram (A-1) and Rahul (A-2) has been convicted for offences punishable under Sections 120- B, 302/34 (three counts), 392, 397, 398, 460, 342 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’) as well as for offence under Section 25(1B) of the Arms Act, 1959 (for short ‘Arms Act’) and sentenced thereunder in the manner as mentioned at the following chart:-
| Conviction | Sentence |
| 1. Under Section 120-B of IPC. | 1. Life Imprisonment. 2. Fine of Rs.200/-. 3. In case of default of fine amount, to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 02 months. |
| 2. Under Section 302/34 (three counts) of IPC. | 1. Life Imprisonment. 2. Fine of Rs.200/-. 3. In case of default of fine amount, to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 02 months. |
| 3. Under Section 392 of IPC. | In place of Section 392, sentenced under Section Section 397 of IPC bei |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
