SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 5546

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Mr. Ramesh Sinha, CJ
SAYYED SAHIL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
MCRC/3528/2025



Advocates:
Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate; Mr. Bharat Gulbani, Panel Lawyer

The court ruled that habitual offender status and potential evidence tampering are significant factors in denying bail applications.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 483 - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 20(b) - Third bail application rejected due to criminal antecedents and tampering with evidence - Previous bail applications were denied based on the applicant's habitual offender status. (Paras 1, 2, 7, 8)

(B) Bail - Consideration for bail applications - The court must consider the applicant's criminal history and the potential for tampering with evidence when deciding on bail. (Paras 7, 8)

Facts of the case:
The applicant was arrested for possession of Ganja, with previous bail applications denied due to criminal antecedents. The seizure witnesses turned hostile, but this was deemed insufficient for bail.

Findings of Court:
The applicant's habitual offender status and the nature of the evidence led to the rejection of the bail application.

Issues: The main issues were the applicant's criminal antecedents and the implications of hostile witnesses on the bail decision.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that previous criminal history and the potential for evidence tampering are critical factors in bail considerations.

Result: Third bail application rejected.

Order on Board

07.05.2025

1. This is the third bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 49/2024 registered at Police Station Keregaon, District - Dhamtari (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 20(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act , 1985.

2. The earlier first bail and second bail application of the applicant were rejected by this Court in MCRC No. 6230/2024 and MCRC No. 8791/2024, vide order dated 06.09.2024 and 16.12.2024 respectively on the ground of criminal antecedents. Hence, this third bail application.

3. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 19.07.2024 the Police of Police Station Keregaon, District Tamarind received a secret information from the informant with the averment that three persons were carrying some contraband article Ganja, travelling from Sihawa to Tamarind on motorcycle and on the basis of said information the Police have seized 01.070 Kgs of Ganja from joint possession of the applicant and other accused persons. Therefore, the alleged offence has been registered against the present applicant.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the earlier first bail and second bail applications of the applicant were rejected by this Court in MCRC No. 6230/2024 and MCRC No. 8791/2024, vide order dated 06.09.2024 and 16.12.2024 respectively on the ground of criminal antecedents, therefore this third bail application is filed on the ground that since the seizure witnesses have turned hostile before the learned trial Court, charge-sheet has already been filed in the present case and the applicant is in jail since 19.07.2024, hence, he prays for releasing the applicant on regular bail.

5. On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes the bail application and submits that the earlier first bail and second bail application of the applicant were rejected by this Court in MCRC No. 6230/2024 and MCRC No. 8791/2024, vide order dated 06.09.2024 and 16.12.2024 respectively on the ground of criminal antecedents. He further submits that the applicant has a criminal antecedent under the NDPS Act, which is still pending and he is a habitual offender, as such, the bail application of the applicant is liable to be rejected.

6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.

7. Considering the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, as the seizure witnesses have turned hostile, the same cannot be a ground for releasing the applicant on bail as the same amounts to only tampering with the evidence.

8. From perusal of the impugned orders, it transpires that the earlier first bail and second bail applications of the applicant were rejected by this Court in MCRC No. 6230/2024 and MCRC No. 8791/2024, vide order dated 06.09.2024 and 16.12.2024 respectively on the ground of criminal antecedents and further considering the fact that the applicant has one criminal antecedent under the NDPS Act, which is still pending, which shows that the applicant is a habitual offender and also in light of the judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in Deepak Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Another reported in (2022) 8 SCC 559 , wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court had cancelled the bail granted to the accused therein on the ground that the accused had previous antecedents, this Court is of the opinion that is not a fit case to enlarge the applicant on regular bail. Accordingly, the third bail application of the applicant – Sayyed Sahil, filed under Section 483 of the BNSS , involved in Crime No. 49/2024 registered at Police Station Keregaon, District - Dhamtari (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 20(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act , 1985, is rejected.

9. Office is directed to provide a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top