IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu, J
SMT. DUKALHEEN HARIJAN @ SUNANI – Appellant
Versus
BANSATA PATEL – Respondent
Order On Board
09/05/2025
1. Heard on I.A. No.1, which is an application for condonation of delay of 275 days in filing the appeal.
2. Learned counsel for respondent No.3 opposes the application and the submission made on behalf of appellants. She however, submits that if this Court considers to condone the delay then it may be ordered that appellants will not be entitled for the interest for delayed period. In support of her contention, she placed reliance upon the decision in case of Lakkamma Vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. , reported in (2021) 20 SCC 797 .
3. Considering the pleadings made in the application as also the submission of learned counsel for respective parties I find it appropriate to allow the I.A. No.1, and condone the delay in filing this appeal. Accordingly, the I.A. No.1 is allowed and the delay of 275 days in filing this appeal is condoned. The appeal is admitted for hearing.
4. Learned counsel for respective parties submits that the liability to indemnify the amount of compensation is fastened upon respondent No.3/Insurance Company, hence with the consent of the parties, the case is heard finally at motion stage.
5. Claimants/appellants have filed this appeal u
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.