SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 5949

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad, J
JAIKUMAR AGRAWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
WPC/1889/2025



Advocates:
Mr. Sudhir Agrawal, Advocate; Mr. Raj Kumar Gupta, Addl. Advocate General; Mr. Varun Sharma, Advocate; Mr. Dhiraj Kumar Wankhede, Advocate; Mr. Tushar Dhar Diwan, Advocate

Prior consent from landowners is not required for the erection of electricity transmission lines, emphasizing public interest over individual property rights.

Headnote:(A) Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 164 - Telegraph Act, 1885 - Section 10 - Construction of transmission towers on agricultural land - Petitioner alleged illegal construction without notice or consent - Court found that prior consent of landowner is not required for erection of transmission lines as per statutory provisions - Compensation offered to petitioner was deemed sufficient - Approval Order dated 11/03/2024 was not cancelled due to non-compliance - Petitioner’s objections were dismissed as legally untenable. (Paras 6, 10)

(B) Public Interest - The construction of transmission lines is a project of national importance, and the rights of the landowner must be balanced against the larger public interest. (Paras 10, 11)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a 94-year-old agriculturist, owned 8.73 acres of land, which was encroached upon by CSPTCL for constructing transmission towers without proper notice or compliance with statutory requirements. The petitioner sought various reliefs, including stopping construction and restoring land.

Findings of Court:
The court ruled that the construction was lawful under the Electricity Act and Telegraph Act, and the petitioner was entitled to compensation but not an injunction.

Issues: The main issues were whether prior consent was required for construction on the petitioner’s land and the legality of the actions taken by CSPTCL.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that prior consent from the landowner is not necessary for the erection of transmission lines, emphasizing the public interest in electricity transmission.

Result: Writ petition stands disposed of.

C.A.V. Order

1. The Petitioner is the owner of 8.73 acres of agricultural land in Village Korbi, Tehsil Baloda, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.), on which respondent Nos. 2 to 5 (CSPTCL) have illegally dug 16 large pits and begun construction of transmission towers without prior notice, consent, or compliance with the mandatory conditions of theApproval Order dated 11/03/2024 issued by the State Government. Through this writ petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs : -

“10.1 May direct to, respondent No. 2 to 5 (CSPTCL) that construction work in land of petitioner may be immediately stopped due to illegal construction for erection of transmission tower on the land of the petitioner mentioned in Annexure P-16, because granted permission by CG State Government vide order dated 11/03/2024 (Annexure P-1) has become infructuous and nullified due to non-compliance of its mentioned (Annexure P-1) condition by Respondent No. 2 to 5 (CSPTCL), and prayer is also that direction may be given to Respondent No. 2 to 5 (CSPTCL) to restore the actual position of land of Petitioner

10.2) May consider that there is no effect of the order Annexure P-10 and P- 13 for both dated 22/01/2025 issued in absence of Petitioner and without knowledge of Petitioner, by Respondent no 6 (Sub Divisional Officer, Revenue) which has been issued ex-parte and in hurry, to legalize the illegal work of Respondent No. 2 to 5 (CSPTCL) retrospectively

10.3) May consider that the work of construction of transmission tower and transmission lines done by Respondent No. 2 to 5 (CSPTCL), on the petitioner's land is the illegal and unauthorized work

10.4) May direct the Respondent No. 2 to 5 (CSPTCL) to remove all erected structures and restore the land to its original condition

10.5) May direct the Respondent No. 2 to 5 (CSPTCL) to pay exemplary damages to Petitioner for causing mental harassment to Petitioner for illegal action of Respondent no. 2 to 5 (CSPTCL) without authority and done without knowledge and without intimation to the Petitioner

10.6) May direct Respondent No. 2 to 5 (CSPTCL) that no further work may be carried out in any of Petitioner's land, detail of which is given in Annexure P-16.

10.7) May direct the Respondent No. 2 to 5 (CSPTCL) to bear the cost of the present litigation, including court fees and legal expenses incurred by the Petitioner, as the illegal and unauthorized actions of the Respondents have compelled the Petitioner to approach this Hon'ble Court for justice.

10.8) May grant any other relief as deemed fit in the interest of justice.”

2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner, a 94-year-old citizen of India and an agriculturist by profession, is the lawful owner of 8.73 acres of agricultural land located in Village Korbi, Patwari Halka No. 012 (presently Halka No. 00008), Tehsil Baloda, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, comprising Khasra Nos. 705/7, 730/5, and 658/8 admeasuring 1.3100 hectare, 1.0740 hectare and 1.1490 hectare respectively (collectively referred to as the "land of the petitioner"). Approximately 4.86 acres (55.7%) of this land, (referred to as the "affected land area") has been illegally encroached upon and disturbed by respondent Nos. 2 to 5 (CSPTCL), who, without notice, consent, or adherence to the binding conditions of the Approval Order dated 11/03/2024 of the State Government (Annexure P-1), initiated the construction of transmission towers as part of a diversion project necessitated by the construction of National Highway No. 130A. Sixteen large pits were dug initially, followed by eight more pits on 08/03/2025 in Khasra No. 705/7, amounting to serious and continued encroachment, despite clear statutory requirements mandating prior identification of affected land in the presence of the landowner, payment of compensation, and formal permission from the competent authority upon objection, as stipulated under the Chhattisgarh Government Order dated 20/02/2015 (Annexure P- 2), Central Government SOP

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top