IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Parth Prateem Sahu, J
Md. Suhail Alam – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court directed decision on application and maintained status quo. (Para 6) |
Order on Board
1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not pressing the relief as prayed for in para 10.1, however, his grievance is with respect to the relief as prayed in para 10.2.
3. Learned counsel for the State submits that the application has been filed only on 15.05.2025. If the application is still pending consideration before the competent Authority, appropriate orders will be passed in accordance with law.
5. The main grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent No.
6. In the aforementioned facts of the case, the writ petition at this stage is disposed of directing the respondent No. 4 to consider and take decision on the application filed by the petitioner under Section 129 CGLRC within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of order passed by this Court. Till the respondent No. 4 passes an order on the application under Section 129 CGLRC filed by the petitioner, it is directed that the parties shall maintain status-quo as it exists today with respect to the land owned by the petitioner bearing khasra No. No.
7. I.A. N
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.