SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 1108

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
GOVIND PRASAD SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent


NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 878 of 2022

1. Govind Prasad Sharma S/o Late Shri Biharilal Sharma, Aged About

53 Years, R/o Ward No. 3, Bilaigarh, P.S. Bilaigarh, District Balodabazar Bhatapara (C.G.)

2. Gopal Sharma S/o Late Shri Biharilal Sharma, Aged About 51 Years R/o Ward No. 3, Bilaigarh, P.S. Bilaigarh, District Balodabazar Bhatapara (C.G.)

---- Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Nagri Prashasan Avam Vikas Vibhag, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Director, Nagri Prashasan Avam Vikas Vibhag, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. The Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Bilaigarh, District-

Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. A. S. Rajput, counsel for petitioners For State : Mr. Vikash Shrivastava, P.L.

For Respondent no.3 : Mr. Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy

Order On Board

17.02.2022

1. The petitioners in the present writ petition is aggrieved of Annexure P-

3 dated 02.02.2022 passed by the respondent no.3 whereby the petitioners have been asked to remove the boundar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top