Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Narendra Kumar Vyas, Amitendra Kishore Prasad, JJ
Tata Projects Limited – Appellant
Versus
Chhattisgarh Infotech Promotion Society – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's claim regarding performance guarantee. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. nature of the dispute leading to writ petition. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court observations on maintainability and directions. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. final disposal of the writ petition. (Para 10 , 11) |
Per Narendra Kumar Vyas, Judge
05/06 /2025
1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India and has prayed for following relief:-
(i) Issue a writ or order or direction in the form of mandamus directing restoration of status quo ante to place the petitioner in the same position in which it was prior to the encashment of the Performance Bank Guarantee No. 0999518BG1000493 for Rs. 167.46 crore by:-
(a) Directing respondent No. 1 to return Rs. 167.46 crores being the proceeds of the bank guarantee No. 0999518BG1000493 to respondent No. 4; and (b) Directing respondent No. 4 to issue another identical bank guarantee for Rs. 167.46 crores to be kept valid till the resolution of disputes between the parties.
(ii) In the alternative, issue a writ or order or direction in the form of mandamus directing respondent No. 1 to deposit Rs. 167.46 crores, being the proceeds of t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
