SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 1375

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
RAMKUMAR @ NANKI and ORS. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent


NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Criminal Appeal No. 867 of 2010

1.Ramkumar @ Nanki, S/o Mohanamandal Satnami, Aged about 24 years.

2.Uttam Kumar S/o Late Mahetarlal Satnami, aGeda bout 25 years.

3.Uttra Kumar S/o Badru Satnami

4.Jai Kumar S/o Mohanamandal Satnami, Aged about 26 years.

5.Mohanamandal @ Mahamandal S/o Ghasiyaram Satnami, Aged about 46 years.

All are R/o Village Kharkena, Police Station Dabhra, Distt. Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

---Appellants Versus State of Chhattisgarh through Thana Incharge, Police Station Dabhra, Distt. Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh. ---Respondent For Appellants :- Mr. Rahil Kochar, Advocate For State :- Ms. Ruchi Nagar, Dy. G.A.

Criminal Revision No. 58 of 2011

1.Dujeram Bhardwaj (died) through Lrs :-

a. Hemlal Bhardwaj S/o Late Dujeram Bhardwaj, Aged about 50 years, R/o Village Kharkena, Police Station Dabhra, Distt. Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

---Applicant (Victim)

Versus

1.The State of Chhattisgarh through the District Magistrate, Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

2.Ramkumar @ Nanki S/o Mohanamandal Satnami, Aged about 24 years.

3.Uttam Kumar S/o Late Shri Mahettarlal Satnami, Aged about 25 years.

4.Uttara Kumar (died and deleted).

5.Jay Kumar S/o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top