SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 1554

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Shivdayal Jain – Appellant
Versus
Anil Kumar Dhurandhar – Respondent


NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WP.(227) No.642 of 2019 Shivdayal Jain S/o Pooran Ram Jain Aged About 86 Years R/o Senior M.I.G. -730, Sector 2, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. (Plaintiff)., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner Versus

1. Anil Kumar Dhurandhar S/o Mahendra Kumar Dhurandhar Aged About 64 Years Through Power Of Attorney, Keshav Dhurandhar, R/o Azad Chowk, Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. (Defendants) ---Respondents For Petitioner: Shri Rishab Bajaj appears on behalf of Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Advocates.

For Respondent No.1: Shri Ashish Shrivastava, Sr. Adv along with Shri Aman Pandey, Advocates.

For Respondent No.2/State: Shri Sudhir Sahu, PL.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari

Order on Board

13.12.2022

1. Being aggrieved by the order dated 27.04.2019 passed by the 2nd Civil Judge, Class-II, Raipur in Civil Suit No.03-A/2013 in which, the application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC filed by the Petitioner/Plaintiff has been rejected.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the Petitioner/Plaintiff has filed a civil suit on 06.09.2013 for declaration and permanent

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top