SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 6847

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Judge, J
SANTDEEN PAHADI – Appellant
Versus
JUGNATH YADAV – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Not specified
For the Respondents: Not specified

C.A.V Order

1. Appellants-claimants have filed this appeal under the provisions of Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short “Act of 1988”) questioning the legality and sustainability of the award dated 20.08.2019 passed by Learned Additional Tribunal to the Upper Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Katghora, District Korba, Chhattisgarh (for short “Claims Tribunal”) in Claim Case No. 60/2018, whereby learned Claims Tribunal allowed the application filed under Section 166 of the Act of 1988 in part, awarded total sum of ₹ 50,000/- as compensation to the appellants-claimants along with interest @ 9% p.a. and fastened the liability to satisfy the amount of compensation upon Respondent No. 3/ Insurance Company.

2. Facts of the case relevant for disposal of this appeal are that on 04.12.2017 at about 05:00 pm when Ravindra Pahadi was travelling on a motor cycle and returning from Bilaspur to his house at Katghora, on the way one tanker bearing registration No. CG15AC3591 (for short “offending vehicle”) driven by Respondent No. 1/ Non-applicant No. 1 rashly and negligently dashed the motorcycle of Ravindra Pahadi and caused accident. In the accident Ravindra Pahadi suffered grie

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top