Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Ramesh Sinha, CJ, Bibhu Datta Guru, J
Deep @ Ayush Sinha – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. hearing of both parties on implications of fir. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. allegations of illegal gambling and petitioner's defense. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's approach to quashing fir based on jurisdictional power. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. standards for interference in fir under code of criminal procedure. (Para 8) |
| 5. final decision on dismissal of the petition. (Para 9) |
Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice
30.06.2025
1. Heard Mr. Neeraj Kumar Mehta, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Also heard Mr. Malay Jain, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State/respondent Nos.1 to 5, Mr. Rishabh Gupta, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No. 6 and Ms. Hamida Siddiqui, learned counsel, appearing for respondent Nos. 8, 9 &
10.
2. The present petition under Section 428 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers :-
“It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to:
1. allow this petition, 2. call for entire records from the respondent authorities concerned relating to registration of Crime No. 0182/2023, 3. quash the FIR dated 25/05/2023 bearing Crime No.0182 registered at Police Station Ambikapur Dehat (Gandhinang
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
