SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 2587

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MANISH SAHU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
MCRC/6988/2021



NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 6988 of 2021 • Manish Sahu, S/o Shri Pramlal Sahu, aged about 32 Years, R/o Gurmukh Singh Nagar, New Rajendra Nagar, Tahsil and District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

----Applicant Versus • State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Station House Officer, Police Station New Rajendra Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

----Non-applicant For Applicant Shri Sourabh Sharma, Advocate. For State Shri Shakti Singh, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam Chourdiya

Order on Board

28/10/2021

1. The applicant has preferred this first bail application under Section

439 of Cr.P.C. as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No.136/2021 registered at Police Station New Rajendra Nagar, District Raipur, C.G. for the offence punishable under Sections 341 & 394 of Indian Penal Code.

2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 24.06.2021 at about 2:00 pm when complainant- Pramod was returning from market, on the way applicant along with another co-accused stopped him, assaulted upon him by stick, hands and fist and on the point of knife looted Rs.450/-, golden chain and other articles from him. On report being lodged to the above effect, the offence under the aforesaid Sections have been registered against the applicants.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is an innocent person and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that applicant has not committed any offence nor is involved in commission of any offence as alleged against him. He is in custody since 25.06.2021, charge sheet has already been filed and conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time. Therefore, he may be released on bail.

4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application. He submits that the applicant has 13 criminal antecedents bearing Crime No.71/2006 for the offence under Sections 294, 326, 34 of IPC, Crime No.85/2007 for the offence under Section 109 Cr.P.C., Crime No.03/2007 for the offence under Section 151 Cr.P.C., Crime No.01/2005 for the offence under Section 110 Cr.P.C., Crime No.98/2009 for the offence under Section 379 of IPC, Crime No.29/2010 for the offence under Sections 294, 506, 323, 34 of IPC, Crime No.10/2010 for the offence under Section 41(2)/110 Cr.P.C., Crime No.79/06/11 for the offence under Section 41(2)/110 Cr.P.C., Crime No.154/11 for the ofence under Sections 341, 294, 506-B, 323, 34 of IPC and 25 & 27 of the Arms Act, Crime No.06/2007 for the offence under Sections 107 & 116(3) of Cr.P.C, Crime No.89/2007 for the offence under Sections 107 & 116(3) of Cr.P.C., Crime No.39/2009 for the offence under Sections 151/107, 116(3) of Cr.P.C., Crime No.12/2010 for the offence under Sections 151/107, 116(3) of Cr.P.C., Crime No.188/2011 for the offence under Sections 151/107, 116(3) of Cr.P.C.

5. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of allegation against the applicant, the detention period of the applicant, who is 32 years of age, charge sheet has been filed and there is no likelihood of the applicant tampering with the evidence or absconding as admitted by both the counsel and conclusion of trial may take some time, without commenting anything on merits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that present is a fit case to release the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. It is directed that in the event of applicant executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.1,00,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, he shall be released on bail on the following conditions:-

(i) he shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such fact to the Court, (ii) he shall not act in any manner which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious trial, and (iii) he shall appear before the trial Court on each

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top