Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Amitendra Kishore Prasad, J
KULDEEP PRAKASH SINGH CHOUHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. constitutional validity of service rules. (Para 1 , 8) |
| 2. grouping and consolidation of petitions. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. challenging promotional quotas due to discrimination. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. arguments against the 2019 rules. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. examination of the reasons for classification and quota allocation. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 6. criteria for determining constitutionality of service rules. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. rules should ensure equitable promotions among distinct cadres. (Para 30 , 32) |
| 8. assessment of legality and constitutionality of 2019 rules. (Para 38 , 39) |
| 9. dismissal of petitions reaffirms adherence to states' discretion. (Para 41) |
| 10. final ruling on challenges against the 2019 rules. (Para 42 , 43 , 44) |
Per Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge
1) In all the present writ petitions, the petitioners have assailed the constitutional validity of Serial No. 18 of Schedule II and Serial No. 9 of Schedule IV of the Chhattisgarh School Education Services (Education & Administrative) Recruitment and Promotion Rules, 2019 (hereinafter referred as “the Rules of 2019”). In certain writ petitions, the petitioners have further sought a modification of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
