Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Sanjay S. Agrawal, Radhakishan Agrawal, JJ
Gopal Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India Through Its Chief Engineer (Construction), South Eastern Central Railway, Bilaspur – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge regarding the compensation awarded for land acquisition led to arbitration. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. court emphasizes the need for fair hearing and procedural integrity. (Para 7) |
| 3. court orders remand for reconsideration of the arbitration decision. (Para 8) |
Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal Judgment On Board Per Sanjay S. Agrawal, J
21/07/2025 SATISH 1) This appeal has been preferred by the Claimant/Gopal Agrawal under TUMANE Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act, 1996”) read with Section 13 of the Commercial Digitally signed by SATISH TUMANE Court’s Act, 2015, questioning the legality and propriety of the order Date:
2025.07.21
18:13:03 dated 26.02.2024 passed in Arbitration M.J.C. No.193/2020, whereby, +0530 the Presiding Judge, Commercial Court (District Level), Bilaspur has allowed the application filed by the respondent No.1-Union of India under Section 34 of the Act, 1996 and, the award dated 26.02.2020 as was passed by the Additional Commissioner, Bilaspur [Appointed Authority to Act as an Arbitrator under Section 20 (F) of the Railways Act, 1989 ] (hereinafter referred to as “Arbitrator”)
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
