Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Rakesh Mohan Pandey, J
Smt Sadhna Shrivastava – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge against termination process. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding medical leave and absence. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. details of termination and legal compliance. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. court reiterates the need for procedural safeguards. (Para 11) |
| 5. final ruling and order for reinstatement. (Para 12) |
Order on Board
09.07.2025
1) The petitioner has challenged the legality, validity and propriety of the order dated
03.05.2018 passed by respondent No.2, whereby the petitioner was removed from the services.
2) Mr. Shobhit Koshta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was appointed to the post of Observer in the Department of Women and Child Development. He would further submit that in December 2006, the petitioner suffered a major orthopaedic ailment, due to which she applied for casual leave from 06.12.2006 to 08.12.2006. He would also submit that as there was no improvement in the health condition of the petitioner, she sought extension of leave up to 05.01.2007. The petitioner regularly informed the Project Officer about her health condition and submitted medical certificates accordingly. Her absence continued due to her prolonged ill
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
