Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Ramesh Sinha, CJ, Bibhu Datta Guru, J
Shivkumar Cherwa – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. vague petitions can be withdrawn with liberty to refile. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. petitioner must properly frame relief requests. (Para 2) |
| 3. vagueness in petitions can lead to dismissal. (Para 3) |
For Petitioner : Mr. Vishwanath Shrivas, Advocate on behalf of Mr. U.P.S. Sahu, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
10/07/2025
1. Heard Mr. Vishwanath Shrivas, learned counsel on behalf of Mr.
U.P.S. Sahu, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents/ State.
2. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:-
“1. That, Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the instant petition under section 528 of B.N.S.
2023 filed by the petitioner, in the interest of justice.
2. That, Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the FIR bearing No. 53/2024 registered on dated 08.08.2024 at police station Pasta, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh filed under section 64(2)(m), 69, 351(2), 303(2), 115(2) of B.N.S. 2023 in the interest of justice.
3. T
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
