Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Ramesh Sinha, CJ, Bibhu Datta Guru, J
Alok Toppo – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background and initial complaint (Para 5 , 6) |
Per, Bibhu Datta Guru, J
17/07/2025
1. Heard Mr. Sangeet Kumar Kushwaha, learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, learned Panel Lawyer appearing on behalf of the State/respondent.
2. This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 03.02.2025 passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.S.C. (POCSO), Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh in Special Case (POCSO) No.32/2020 whereby the appellant has been convicted and sentenced as under:-
Conviction
Sentence
U/s 4 of the POCSO Act
Section 376(3) of the Indian Penal Code provides for an alternative punishment to that provided under this Section
U/s 376 (3) of IPC
R.I. for 20 years and fine of Rs.3,000/-, with default stipulation.
U/s 363 of IPC
R.I. for 03 years and fine of Rs.1,000/-, with default stipulation.
U/s 366 of IPC
R.I. for 05 years and fine of Rs.2,000/-, with default stipulation.
All the sentences were directed to run concurrently.
3. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that mother of the prosecutrix had submitted a written complaint in Chowki- Rampu
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
