Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Radhakishan Agrawal, J
Smt. Pushpa Devi Tibrewal – Appellant
Versus
Surendra Kumar Jain – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal filed under section 378(4) of cr.p.c. (Para 1) |
| 2. supreme court ruling on complainant as victim. (Para 2) |
| 3. discussion on legal rights of the complainant. (Para 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. arguments in favor of the victim's appeal rights. (Para 4) |
| 5. rights of victims to appeal against acquittals. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
For Appellant : Mr. Hrishabh Deo Shukla, Advocate on behalf of Ms. Upasana Mehta, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Ashish Surana, Advocate through Video Conferencing and Mr. Anuj Kumar Pandey, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Ankur Agrawal, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal Judgment on Board
28.07.2025
1. This is an acquittal appeal filed under Section 378 (4) of Cr.P.C . by the complainant against the judgment dated 10.03.2014 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Durg, (C.G.) in Complaint Case No. 1716 of 2011 whereby the learned Trial Court acquitted the respondent/accused of the charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act of 1881”). Along with this appeal, an application under Section 378 (4) of the Cr.P.C . for grant of leave to appeal against the impugned judgment was also filed a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
