Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Ramesh Sinha, CJ, Bibhu Datta Guru, J
Devjeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's findings on the need for trial based on presented allegations. (Para 1 , 6 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 2. the factual background surrounding the fir. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments regarding the legitimacy of the fir and charge sheet. (Para 5 , 7) |
| 4. outcome of the petition. (Para 14) |
Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice
30 .07.2025
1. Heard Mr. Dheerendra Pandey, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. Shailendra Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State/respondent No.1.
2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following relief(s):-
“It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to allow the application by making an order to quash the crime no. 166/2024 dated 08.11.2024 offence u/s 108, 3(5) of BNS Act & quash the final report dated 29.12.2024 and order dated 18.03.2025 and also quash the entire criminal proceeding pending before Session Judge as Session Trail No. 46/2025, offence u/s 108, 3(5) of BNS Act and discharge from the case to the applicant.”
3. Brief facts of the case, are that the deceased, Chanchala Singh, and the petitioner's brother, Sonu Singh, were in a romantic relationship. However, Sonu Singh l
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
